Fritzsch Bernd, Beisel Kirk W, Pauley Sarah, Soukup Garrett
Creighton University, Dept of Biomedical Sciences, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Int J Dev Biol. 2007;51(6-7):663-78. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072367bf.
The molecular basis of mechanosensation, mechanosensory cell development and mechanosensory organ development is reviewed with an emphasis on its evolution. In contrast to eye evolution and development, which apparently modified a genetic program through intercalation of genes between the master control genes on the top (Pax6, Eya1, Six1) of the hierarchy and the structural genes (rhodopsin) at the bottom, the as yet molecularly unknown mechanosensory channel precludes such a firm conclusion for mechanosensors. However, recent years have seen the identification of several structural genes which are involved in mechanosensory tethering and several transcription factors controlling mechanosensory cell and organ development; these warrant the interpretation of available data in very much the same fashion as for eye evolution: molecular homology combined with potential morphological parallelism. This assertion of molecular homology is strongly supported by recent findings of a highly conserved set of microRNAs that appear to be associated with mechanosensory cell development across phyla. The conservation of transcription factors and their regulators fits very well to the known or presumed mechanosensory specializations which can be mostly grouped as variations of a common cellular theme. Given the widespread distribution of the molecular ability to form mechanosensory cells, it comes as no surprise that structurally different mechanosensory organs evolved in different phyla, presenting a variation of a common theme specified by a conserved set of transcription factors in their cellular development. Within vertebrates and arthropods, some mechanosensory organs evolved into auditory organs, greatly increasing sensitivity to sound through modifications of accessory structures to direct sound to the specific sensory epithelia. However, while great attention has been paid to the evolution of these accessory structures in vertebrate fossils, comparatively less attention has been spent on the evolution of the inner ear and the central auditory system. Recent advances in our molecular understanding of ear and brain development provide novel avenues to this neglected aspect of auditory neurosensory evolution.
本文综述了机械感觉、机械感觉细胞发育和机械感觉器官发育的分子基础,并着重探讨了其进化过程。与眼睛的进化和发育不同,眼睛进化和发育显然是通过在层级顶端的主控基因(Pax6、Eya1、Six1)和底端的结构基因(视紫红质)之间插入基因来修改遗传程序,而目前分子层面未知的机械感觉通道使得我们无法对机械感受器得出如此确凿的结论。然而,近年来已经鉴定出了几个参与机械感觉系留的结构基因以及几个控制机械感觉细胞和器官发育的转录因子;这些使得我们能够以与眼睛进化非常相似的方式解读现有数据:分子同源性与潜在的形态平行性相结合。最近发现的一组高度保守的微小RNA似乎与不同门类的机械感觉细胞发育相关,这一发现有力地支持了分子同源性的论断。转录因子及其调节因子的保守性与已知或推测的机械感觉特化非常契合,这些特化大多可以归类为一个共同细胞主题的变体。鉴于形成机械感觉细胞的分子能力分布广泛,不同门类进化出结构不同的机械感觉器官也就不足为奇了,这些器官在细胞发育过程中呈现出由一组保守转录因子指定的共同主题的变体。在脊椎动物和节肢动物中,一些机械感觉器官进化成了听觉器官,通过修改辅助结构将声音导向特定的感觉上皮,从而极大地提高了对声音的敏感度。然而,虽然人们对脊椎动物化石中这些辅助结构的进化给予了极大关注,但对内耳和中枢听觉系统的进化关注相对较少。我们对耳朵和大脑发育的分子理解方面的最新进展为听觉神经感觉进化这一被忽视的方面提供了新的途径。