Merljak Skocir Lilijana, Ruzić-Sabljić Eva, Maraspin-Carman Vera, Lotric-Furlan Stanka, Logar Mateja, Strle Franc
Institute for Public Health, Vipavska cesta 13, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia.
Int J Med Microbiol. 2008 Jul;298(5-6):493-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Sep 24.
The aim of the present study was to establish which combination of serological method and Borrelia strain used as an antigen would provide the most appropriate demonstration of borrelial infection in patients with eythema migrans residing in Slovenia. Four different strains were chosen as antigens: two strains of B. afzelii and two strains of B. garinii which differed in their expression of the outer proteins OspA, OspB and OspC. Each individual strain was used as antigen in immunofluorescence test (IFT), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) with whole borrelial cells, and EIA with ultrasonicated borrelial cells. With these 12 different tests, 100 samples were examined for the presence of specific IgM and IgG antibodies: 50 sera of blood donors and 50 sera of patients with erythema migrans. The latter were further subdivided into skin culture-positive and -negative subgroups. A commercial Western blot (WB) test was performed for 26 sera of the control group and 25 sera of patients with erythema migrans. The four different methods had distinct specificity and sensitivity. The most specific approaches were IFT (100% for IgM and 90-92% for IgG) and the WB test (100% for IgM and 73% for IgG), followed by EIA with whole borrelial cells (80-98% for IgM and 76-84% for IgG) and EIA with ultrasonicated borrelial cells (76-94% for IgM and 72-80% for IgG). The sensitivity levels of all these tests were low. The most sensitive were EIA tests with whole borrelial cells (28-36% for IgM and 32-42% for IgG) followed by EIA with ultrasonicated borrelial cells (22-32% for IgM and 24-36% for IgG), the WB test (16% for IgM and 32% for IgG) and IFT (0-2% for IgM and 14-20% for IgG). The following methods gave significant differences between patients and negative controls in detecting IgM antibodies: EIA with whole borrelial cells with both B. afzelii antigens and with antigen B. garinii that expressed OspA and OspC, EIA with ultrasonicated borrelial cells with antigen B. afzelii that expressed OspA, OspB and OspC. In detecting IgG antibodies, significant differences were observed between EIA with whole borrelial cells and with antigen B. afzelii that expressed OspA and OspB. Borreliae were isolated from the skin of 34/50 (68%) patients with erythema migrans: two strains failed to grow, while 26/32 (81%) strains were identified as B. afzelii, 5/32 (16%) as B. garinii and 1/32 (3%) as B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. No statistically significant differences in serologic test results between culture-positive and -negative patients with erythema migrans were found.
本研究的目的是确定血清学方法和用作抗原的疏螺旋体菌株的哪种组合,能为斯洛文尼亚出现游走性红斑的患者的疏螺旋体感染提供最恰当的检测结果。选择了四种不同的菌株作为抗原:两株阿氏疏螺旋体和两株伽氏疏螺旋体,它们在外膜蛋白OspA、OspB和OspC的表达上存在差异。每种菌株分别用作免疫荧光试验(IFT)、全疏螺旋体细胞酶联免疫吸附测定(EIA)以及超声破碎疏螺旋体细胞EIA中的抗原。通过这12种不同的检测方法,对100份样本进行了特异性IgM和IgG抗体检测:50份献血者血清和50份游走性红斑患者血清。后者又进一步细分为皮肤培养阳性和阴性亚组。对26份对照组血清和25份游走性红斑患者血清进行了商业免疫印迹(WB)检测。这四种不同的方法具有不同的特异性和敏感性。最具特异性的方法是IFT(IgM为100%,IgG为90 - 92%)和WB检测(IgM为100%,IgG为73%),其次是全疏螺旋体细胞EIA(IgM为80 - 98%,IgG为76 - 84%)以及超声破碎疏螺旋体细胞EIA(IgM为76 - 94%,IgG为72 - 80%)。所有这些检测的敏感性水平都较低。最敏感的是全疏螺旋体细胞EIA检测(IgM为28 - 36%,IgG为32 - 42%),其次是超声破碎疏螺旋体细胞EIA(IgM为22 - 32%,IgG为24 - 36%)、WB检测(IgM为16%,IgG为32%)和IFT(IgM为0 - 2%,IgG为14 - 20%)。在检测IgM抗体时,以下方法在患者和阴性对照之间存在显著差异:使用表达OspA和OspC的阿氏疏螺旋体抗原以及伽氏疏螺旋体抗原的全疏螺旋体细胞EIA,使用表达OspA、OspB和OspC的阿氏疏螺旋体抗原的超声破碎疏螺旋体细胞EIA。在检测IgG抗体时,在使用表达OspA和OspB的阿氏疏螺旋体抗原的全疏螺旋体细胞EIA中观察到显著差异。从50例游走性红斑患者中的34例(68%)皮肤中分离出疏螺旋体:2株未能生长,而32株中的26株(81%)被鉴定为阿氏疏螺旋体,32株中的5株(16%)为伽氏疏螺旋体,32株中的1株(3%)为狭义伯氏疏螺旋体。在游走性红斑培养阳性和阴性患者之间,未发现血清学检测结果有统计学显著差异。