Heisler Michele, Faul Jessica D, Hayward Rodney A, Langa Kenneth M, Blaum Caroline, Weir David
Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Management and Outcome Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare Systems, MI 48113-0170, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Sep 24;167(17):1853-60. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.17.1853.
Mechanisms for racial/ethnic disparities in glycemic control are poorly understood.
A nationally representative sample of 1901 respondents 55 years or older with diabetes mellitus completed a mailed survey in 2003; 1233 respondents completed valid at-home hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) kits. We constructed multivariate regression models with survey weights to examine racial/ethnic differences in HbA(1c) control and to explore the association of HbA(1c) level with sociodemographic and clinical factors, access to and quality of diabetes health care, and self-management behaviors and attitudes.
There were no significant racial/ethnic differences in HbA(1c) levels in respondents not taking antihyperglycemic medications. In 1034 respondents taking medications, the mean HbA(1c) value (expressed as percentage of total hemoglobin) was 8.07% in black respondents and 8.14% in Latino respondents compared with 7.22% in white respondents (P < .001). Black respondents had worse medication adherence than white respondents, and Latino respondents had more diabetes-specific emotional distress (P < .001). Adjusting for hypothesized mechanisms accounted for 14.0% of the higher HbA(1c) levels in black respondents and 19.0% in Latinos, with the full model explaining 22.0% of the variance. Besides black and Latino ethnicity, only insulin use (P < .001), age younger than 65 years (P = .007), longer diabetes duration (P = .004), and lower self-reported medication adherence (P = .04) were independently associated with higher HbA(1c) levels.
Latino and African American respondents had worse glycemic control than white respondents. Socioeconomic, clinical, health care, and self-management measures explained approximately a fifth of the HbA(1c) differences. One potentially modifiable factor for which there were racial disparities--medication adherence--was among the most significant independent predictors of glycemic control.
血糖控制方面种族/民族差异的机制尚不清楚。
2003年,对1901名55岁及以上患有糖尿病的全国代表性受访者进行了邮寄调查;1233名受访者完成了有效的家庭血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)检测试剂盒。我们构建了带有调查权重的多元回归模型,以研究HbA1c控制方面的种族/民族差异,并探讨HbA1c水平与社会人口学和临床因素、糖尿病医疗保健的可及性和质量以及自我管理行为和态度之间的关联。
未服用降糖药物的受访者中,HbA1c水平在种族/民族上无显著差异。在1034名正在服药的受访者中,黑人受访者的平均HbA1c值(以总血红蛋白的百分比表示)为8.07%,拉丁裔受访者为8.14%,而白人受访者为7.22%(P <.001)。黑人受访者的药物依从性比白人受访者差,拉丁裔受访者有更多特定于糖尿病的情绪困扰(P <.001)。对假设机制进行调整后,黑人受访者较高的HbA1c水平中有14.0%得到解释,拉丁裔中有19.0%得到解释,完整模型解释了22.0%的方差。除了黑人和拉丁裔种族外,只有使用胰岛素(P <.001)、年龄小于65岁(P =.007)、糖尿病病程较长(P =.004)以及自我报告的药物依从性较低(P =.04)与较高的HbA1c水平独立相关。
拉丁裔和非裔美国受访者的血糖控制比白人受访者差。社会经济、临床、医疗保健和自我管理措施解释了约五分之一的HbA1c差异。种族差异存在的一个潜在可改变因素——药物依从性——是血糖控制最重要的独立预测因素之一。