Suppr超能文献

单案例研究探究中反思性研究的伦理问题。

The ethics of reflective research in single case study inquiry.

作者信息

Winship Gary

机构信息

University of Nottingham, School of Education Campus, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2007 Oct;43(4):174-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2007.00132.x.

Abstract

TOPIC

Recent developments in policy change in the governance of research ethics in the UK are reviewed and discussed regarding how the changes in informed consent impacts on single case study research.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in the ethics of health research (particularly in the UK) and informed patient consent have potentially negative implications for case study research where overregulated research guidance may impinge on patient treatment.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The psychotherapy milieu is a highly protective environment where case study research design has, historically, been effectively applied without compromising clients' interests and treatment. A distinction between "prospective" and "reflective" psychotherapy research is proposed that offers an ethical foothold, protecting patients and allowing scope for practitioners to continue to advance knowledge from their reflective practice.

摘要

主题

回顾并讨论了英国研究伦理治理方面政策变化的最新进展,以及知情同意的变化如何影响单病例研究。

结论

健康研究伦理的变化(尤其是在英国)以及患者的知情同意,对于案例研究具有潜在的负面影响,因为过度规范的研究指导可能会影响患者的治疗。

实践意义

心理治疗环境是一个高度保护性的环境,在历史上,案例研究设计已在不损害客户利益和治疗的情况下得到有效应用。本文提出了“前瞻性”和“反思性”心理治疗研究之间的区别,这提供了一个伦理立足点,既能保护患者又能为从业者提供空间,使其能够从反思性实践中继续推进知识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验