Wahlgren N G, Bornhov S, Sharma A, Cederin B, Rosolacci T, Ashwood T, Claesson L
Department of Neurology, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3057(99)80072-x.
The CLASS study showed no significant difference between treatment groups for the neuroprotectant clomethiazole compared with placebo. However, a beneficial effect of the drug was seen in patients with total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS). These are patients with clinical symptoms suggesting a large stroke. Full results of this subgroup analysis are reported. Patients were classified before randomization using clinical symptoms into the stroke syndromes TACS, partial anterior circulation syndrome, and lacunar syndrome. Subgroup analyses of stroke syndromes were performed post hoc after detecting a treatment by severity interaction. The primary efficacy variable was relative functional independence defined as the proportion of patients scoring > or =60 on the Barthel Index at 90 days. TACS patients (n=546, 40% of all CLASS patients) were more severe at baseline on the 58 point Scandinavian Stroke Scale compared with non-TACS patients (median difference 10 points, mean difference 10.9 points, SE=0.6). Outcome for TACS patients treated with placebo was poor, with only 29.8% reaching relative functional independence. This was increased to 40.8% in the clomethiazole group, a 37% relative benefit, which is clinically significant (odds ratio=1.62, 95% CI 1.13-2.31, nominal P=.008). There was little or no difference in the outcome of non-TACS patients treated with clomethiazole compared with placebo. The treatment effect in TACS patients was quite consistent across participating countries and the 3 parts of the study defined by the 2 interim analyses. The treatment effect seen in patients with clinical symptoms suggesting a large stroke (TACS) is biologically plausible but requires confirmation in a prospective study which is ongoing.
CLASS研究表明,与安慰剂相比,神经保护剂氯美噻唑治疗组之间无显著差异。然而,在完全性前循环综合征(TACS)患者中观察到了该药物的有益效果。这些患者有提示大面积卒中的临床症状。报告了该亚组分析的完整结果。患者在随机分组前根据临床症状被分为TACS、部分前循环综合征和腔隙综合征卒中综合征。在检测到治疗与严重程度的相互作用后,对卒中综合征进行了事后亚组分析。主要疗效变量是相对功能独立性,定义为90天时巴氏指数得分≥60分的患者比例。与非TACS患者相比,TACS患者(n = 546,占所有CLASS患者的40%)在58分的斯堪的纳维亚卒中量表上基线时病情更严重(中位数差异10分,平均差异10.9分,SE = 0.6)。接受安慰剂治疗的TACS患者预后较差,只有29.8%达到相对功能独立性。氯美噻唑组这一比例增至40.8%,相对获益37%,具有临床意义(优势比 = 1.62,95% CI 1.13 - 2.31,名义P = 0.008)。与安慰剂相比,接受氯美噻唑治疗的非TACS患者的预后几乎没有差异。TACS患者的治疗效果在参与研究的各个国家以及由两次中期分析定义的研究的三个部分中相当一致。在有提示大面积卒中临床症状(TACS)的患者中观察到的治疗效果在生物学上是合理的,但需要正在进行的前瞻性研究予以证实。