• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氯美噻唑急性卒中研究(CLASS):545例被归类为完全前循环综合征(TACS)患者的疗效结果。

The clomethiazole acute stroke study (CLASS): efficacy results in 545 patients classified as total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS).

作者信息

Wahlgren N G, Bornhov S, Sharma A, Cederin B, Rosolacci T, Ashwood T, Claesson L

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3057(99)80072-x.

DOI:10.1016/s1052-3057(99)80072-x
PMID:17895170
Abstract

The CLASS study showed no significant difference between treatment groups for the neuroprotectant clomethiazole compared with placebo. However, a beneficial effect of the drug was seen in patients with total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS). These are patients with clinical symptoms suggesting a large stroke. Full results of this subgroup analysis are reported. Patients were classified before randomization using clinical symptoms into the stroke syndromes TACS, partial anterior circulation syndrome, and lacunar syndrome. Subgroup analyses of stroke syndromes were performed post hoc after detecting a treatment by severity interaction. The primary efficacy variable was relative functional independence defined as the proportion of patients scoring > or =60 on the Barthel Index at 90 days. TACS patients (n=546, 40% of all CLASS patients) were more severe at baseline on the 58 point Scandinavian Stroke Scale compared with non-TACS patients (median difference 10 points, mean difference 10.9 points, SE=0.6). Outcome for TACS patients treated with placebo was poor, with only 29.8% reaching relative functional independence. This was increased to 40.8% in the clomethiazole group, a 37% relative benefit, which is clinically significant (odds ratio=1.62, 95% CI 1.13-2.31, nominal P=.008). There was little or no difference in the outcome of non-TACS patients treated with clomethiazole compared with placebo. The treatment effect in TACS patients was quite consistent across participating countries and the 3 parts of the study defined by the 2 interim analyses. The treatment effect seen in patients with clinical symptoms suggesting a large stroke (TACS) is biologically plausible but requires confirmation in a prospective study which is ongoing.

摘要

CLASS研究表明,与安慰剂相比,神经保护剂氯美噻唑治疗组之间无显著差异。然而,在完全性前循环综合征(TACS)患者中观察到了该药物的有益效果。这些患者有提示大面积卒中的临床症状。报告了该亚组分析的完整结果。患者在随机分组前根据临床症状被分为TACS、部分前循环综合征和腔隙综合征卒中综合征。在检测到治疗与严重程度的相互作用后,对卒中综合征进行了事后亚组分析。主要疗效变量是相对功能独立性,定义为90天时巴氏指数得分≥60分的患者比例。与非TACS患者相比,TACS患者(n = 546,占所有CLASS患者的40%)在58分的斯堪的纳维亚卒中量表上基线时病情更严重(中位数差异10分,平均差异10.9分,SE = 0.6)。接受安慰剂治疗的TACS患者预后较差,只有29.8%达到相对功能独立性。氯美噻唑组这一比例增至40.8%,相对获益37%,具有临床意义(优势比 = 1.62,95% CI 1.13 - 2.31,名义P = 0.008)。与安慰剂相比,接受氯美噻唑治疗的非TACS患者的预后几乎没有差异。TACS患者的治疗效果在参与研究的各个国家以及由两次中期分析定义的研究的三个部分中相当一致。在有提示大面积卒中临床症状(TACS)的患者中观察到的治疗效果在生物学上是合理的,但需要正在进行的前瞻性研究予以证实。

相似文献

1
The clomethiazole acute stroke study (CLASS): efficacy results in 545 patients classified as total anterior circulation syndrome (TACS).氯美噻唑急性卒中研究(CLASS):545例被归类为完全前循环综合征(TACS)患者的疗效结果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):231-9. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3057(99)80072-x.
2
Clomethiazole acute stroke study (CLASS): results of a randomized, controlled trial of clomethiazole versus placebo in 1360 acute stroke patients.氯美噻唑急性中风研究(CLASS):1360例急性中风患者中氯美噻唑与安慰剂对比的随机对照试验结果
Stroke. 1999 Jan;30(1):21-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.1.21.
3
The Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in tissue-type plasminogen activator-treated stroke (CLASS-T): final results.氯美噻唑治疗组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗的急性卒中研究(CLASS-T):最终结果
Neurology. 2001 Oct 9;57(7):1199-205. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.7.1199.
4
The clomethiazole acute stroke study (CLASS): Safety results in 1,356 patients with acute hemispheric stroke.氯美噻唑急性脑卒中研究(CLASS):1356 例急性大脑半球脑卒中患者的安全性结果。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000 Jul-Aug;9(4):158-65. doi: 10.1053/jscd.2000.7236.
5
Clomethiazole Acute Stroke Study in ischemic stroke (CLASS-I): final results.氯美噻唑急性缺血性卒中研究(CLASS-I):最终结果
Stroke. 2002 Jan;33(1):122-8. doi: 10.1161/hs0102.101478.
6
Results in 95 hemorrhagic stroke patients included in CLASS, a controlled trial of clomethiazole versus placebo in acute stroke patients.纳入CLASS(一项氯美噻唑与安慰剂治疗急性卒中患者的对照试验)的95例出血性卒中患者的结果。
Stroke. 2000 Jan;31(1):82-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.1.82.
7
Prognostic value of CT scan features in acute ischaemic stroke and relationship with clinical stroke syndromes.
Int J Clin Pract. 2000 Oct;54(8):514-8.
8
Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of acute stroke clinical subtypes defined by multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.多模态磁共振成像定义的急性卒中临床亚型的诊断准确性差异。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;74(7):886-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.886.
9
Neuroprotectants in the treatment of stroke--an overview.神经保护剂在中风治疗中的应用综述
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000 Nov;9(6 Pt 2):32-5. doi: 10.1053/jscd.2000.19320.
10
A 6-Point TACS Score Predicts In-Hospital Mortality Following Total Anterior Circulation Stroke.六点TACS评分可预测完全性前循环卒中后的院内死亡率。
J Clin Neurol. 2016 Oct;12(4):407-413. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2016.12.4.407.

引用本文的文献

1
The hazards of chasing subgroups in neutral stroke trials.中性卒中试验中追踪亚组的风险。
Neurol Res Pract. 2025 Mar 11;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s42466-025-00369-0.
2
Understanding the Pathophysiology of Ischemic Stroke: The Basis of Current Therapies and Opportunity for New Ones.了解缺血性脑卒中的病理生理学:当前治疗方法的基础和新方法的机会。
Biomolecules. 2024 Mar 4;14(3):305. doi: 10.3390/biom14030305.
3
Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives.中风的病理生理学和治疗:现状和未来展望。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 15;21(20):7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609.
4
Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for acute stroke.用于急性中风的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)受体激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 30;10(10):CD009622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009622.pub5.
5
Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for acute stroke.用于急性中风的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)受体激动剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD009622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009622.pub4.
6
Stroke pathophysiology: management challenges and new treatment advances.中风病理生理学:管理挑战与新的治疗进展
J Physiol Biochem. 2007 Sep;63(3):261-77. doi: 10.1007/BF03165789.
7
Why have neuro-protectants failed?: lessons learned from stroke trials.神经保护剂为何失败?:从中风试验中吸取的教训。
J Neurol. 2005 Sep;252(9):1011-20. doi: 10.1007/s00415-005-0933-6. Epub 2005 Aug 25.
8
Population pharmacokinetics of clomethiazole and its effect on the natural course of sedation in acute stroke patients.氯美噻唑的群体药代动力学及其对急性中风患者自然镇静过程的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Aug;56(2):173-83. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2003.01850.x.