Lee Mary Y, Benn Rita, Wimsatt Leslie, Cornman Jane, Hedgecock Joan, Gerik Susan, Zeller Janice, Kreitzer Mary Jo, Allweiss Pamela, Finklestein Claudia, Haramati Aviad
Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA.
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10):939-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318149ebf8.
A few years ago, the National Institutes of Health National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine funded a program called the Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) Education Project. Grantees were 14 medical and nursing schools and the American Medical Student Association, which funded six additional medical schools. Grants were awarded in cohorts of five per year in 2000, 2001, and 2002-2003. The R25 grant recipients identified several major themes as crucial to the success of integrating CAM into health professions curricula. The rationale for integrating CAM curricula was in part to enable future health professionals to provide informed advice as patients dramatically increase the use of CAM. Success of new CAM education programs relied on leadership, including top-down support from institutions' highest administrators. Formal and informal engagement of key faculty and opinion leaders raised awareness, interest, and participation in programs. A range of faculty development efforts increased CAM-teaching capacity. The most effective strategies for integration addressed a key curriculum need and used some form of evidence-based practice framework. Most programs used a combination of instructional delivery strategies, including experiential components and online resources, to address the needs of learners while promoting a high level of ongoing interest in CAM topics. Institutions noted several benefits, including increased faculty development activities, the creation of new programs, and increased cross- and inter-university collaborations. Common challenges included the need for qualified faculty, crowded and changing curricula, a lack of defined best practices in CAM, and post-grant sustainability of programs.
几年前,美国国立卫生研究院国家补充与替代医学中心资助了一个名为补充与替代医学(CAM)教育项目的计划。受资助者包括14所医学院和护理学院以及美国医学生协会,后者又资助了另外6所医学院。2000年、2001年以及2002年至2003年期间,每年分五批授予资助。获得R25资助的机构确定了几个主要主题,这些主题对于将补充与替代医学融入卫生专业课程的成功至关重要。将补充与替代医学课程纳入其中的理由部分在于,随着患者对补充与替代医学的使用大幅增加,使未来的卫生专业人员能够提供明智的建议。新的补充与替代医学教育项目的成功依赖于领导力,包括机构最高管理人员自上而下的支持。关键教师和意见领袖的正式和非正式参与提高了对项目的认识、兴趣和参与度。一系列教师发展努力提高了补充与替代医学的教学能力。最有效的整合策略满足了课程的关键需求,并采用了某种形式的循证实践框架。大多数项目采用了多种教学交付策略的组合,包括体验式内容和在线资源,以满足学习者的需求,同时促进对补充与替代医学主题的持续高度兴趣。各机构指出了多项益处,包括增加教师发展活动、创建新项目以及加强跨大学和大学间的合作。常见的挑战包括需要合格的教师、课程拥挤且不断变化、补充与替代医学缺乏明确的最佳实践以及项目在资助后的可持续性。