Spike Jeffrey P
Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4300, USA.
Semin Dial. 2007 Sep-Oct;20(5):387-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00324.x.
Nephrologists, like all physicians, need to offer their patients all reasonable treatment options, but only the reasonable options. When dialysis is (or is not) a reasonable option is an important ethical issue. The justification for dialysis, like any life-sustaining treatment, is that it prolongs life for a patient who either wishes to live or, if cognitively impaired, would (in the opinion of others) likely benefit from extending their life. This article focuses on patients with advanced dementia or severe and irreversible brain injury who are no longer capable of enjoying life, and hence gain no benefit from dialysis. I present guidelines for withholding and withdrawing dialysis and offer suggestions designed to help nephrologists avoid causing harm when the patient's family demands that dialysis be performed.
肾病学家和所有医生一样,需要为患者提供所有合理的治疗选择,但仅限于合理的选择。透析是否是合理的选择是一个重要的伦理问题。与任何维持生命的治疗一样,透析的理由是它能延长那些希望活下去的患者的生命,或者,如果患者存在认知障碍,(在他人看来)延长生命可能会使他们受益。本文关注的是患有晚期痴呆或严重且不可逆脑损伤、已无法享受生活且无法从透析中获益的患者。我提出了停止和撤除透析的指导原则,并提供建议,以帮助肾病学家在患者家属要求进行透析时避免造成伤害。