Suppr超能文献

非药物滥用志愿者口服羟考酮和口服吗啡的心理药理学特征的受试者内比较。

Within-subject comparison of the psychopharmacological profiles of oral oxycodone and oral morphine in non-drug-abusing volunteers.

作者信息

Zacny James P, Lichtor Stephanie A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia & Critical Care MC4028, The University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Jan;196(1):105-16. doi: 10.1007/s00213-007-0937-2. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Nonmedical use and abuse of prescription opioids is a significant problem in the USA. Little attention has been paid to assessing the relative psychopharmacological profile (including abuse liability-related effects) of specific prescription opioids.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to directly compare the psychopharmacological profile of two oral opioids within the same subject.

METHODS

A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study was done in which 20 non-drug-abusing volunteers ingested 10 and 20 mg of oxycodone, 30 and 60 mg of morphine, and placebo in separate sessions. Drug doses were equated on an objective measure of opiate effects: miosis. Subjective, psychomotor, reinforcing, and physiological effects of the opioids were assessed.

RESULTS

In general, the two opioids at equimiotic doses produced similar prototypic opiate-like effects and psychomotor impairment of similar magnitude. However, several effects were found only with 20 mg oxycodone. Both drugs produced abuse liability-related subjective effects but also dysphoric effects, particularly with 60 mg morphine. Neither drug at either dose functioned as a reinforcer, as measured by the Multiple Choice Procedure. Relative potency ratios indicated an average oxycodone/morphine [corrected] ratio of 1:3 [corrected]

CONCLUSIONS

The psychopharmacological profile of oxycodone and morphine at equimiotic doses had many similarities; however, differences were found in producing abuse liability-related and dysphoric effects. In the medical community, it is commonly accepted that oral oxycodone is 1.5 to 2 times as potent as oral morphine in producing analgesia; using this ratio, although patients may experience similar degrees of pain relief, those receiving oxycodone may be experiencing stronger and potentially different psychopharmacological effects.

摘要

理论依据

在美国,非医疗用途使用和滥用处方类阿片是一个重大问题。对于评估特定处方类阿片的相对精神药理学特征(包括与滥用可能性相关的效应),人们关注甚少。

目的

本研究旨在直接比较同一受试者体内两种口服阿片的精神药理学特征。

方法

进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照的交叉研究,20名非药物滥用志愿者在不同时段分别服用10毫克和20毫克羟考酮、30毫克和60毫克吗啡以及安慰剂。根据阿片类药物效应的客观指标(瞳孔缩小)来确定药物剂量。评估了阿片类药物的主观、精神运动、强化和生理效应。

结果

总体而言,两种阿片在等瞳孔剂量下产生了相似的典型阿片样效应和程度相近的精神运动功能损害。然而,仅在20毫克羟考酮时发现了几种效应。两种药物都产生了与滥用可能性相关的主观效应,但也产生了烦躁不安的效应,尤其是60毫克吗啡时。根据多重选择程序测量,两种药物在任何剂量下均未起到强化作用。相对效价比表明,羟考酮/吗啡(校正后)的平均比值为1:3(校正后)。

结论

羟考酮和吗啡在等瞳孔剂量下的精神药理学特征有许多相似之处;然而,在产生与滥用可能性相关的效应和烦躁不安效应方面存在差异。在医学界,人们普遍认为口服羟考酮在产生镇痛作用方面的效力是口服吗啡的1.5至2倍;按照这个比例,尽管患者可能会经历相似程度的疼痛缓解,但服用羟考酮的患者可能会经历更强且可能不同的精神药理效应。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Opioid Use and Driving Performance.阿片类药物的使用与驾驶表现。
J Med Toxicol. 2021 Jul;17(3):289-308. doi: 10.1007/s13181-020-00819-y. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

3
Foundations of opioid risk management.阿片类药物风险管理基础
Clin J Pain. 2007 Feb;23(2):103-18. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000210953.86255.8f.
8
Association between non-medical and prescriptive usage of opioids.阿片类药物非医疗使用与处方使用之间的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006 Apr 28;82(2):135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.08.019. Epub 2005 Oct 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验