Quatrehomme Gérald, Balaguer Thierry, Staccini Pascal, Alunni-Perret Véronique
Laboratoire de Médecine Légale et Anthropologie médico-légale, Faculté de Médecine, GEPITOS, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS K 2943, 28 Avenue de Valombrose, 06100 Nice, France.
Int J Legal Med. 2007 Nov;121(6):469-75. doi: 10.1007/s00414-007-0197-z.
The aim of this work was to estimate the accuracy of craniofacial reconstruction (CFR), from a series of 25 controlled cases. Three protocols of blind CFRs (exhibiting an increasing complexity from A to C) were assessed in this paper, allowing comparison of the CFR with the actual face of the deceased. The whole results showed that an excellent, or good, to middle resemblance (between the blind CFR and the actual face of the subject) was reached in 9 out of 25 cases, but the success gradually increased from the A to the C protocol of CFR, reaching six cases out of eight in the latter. Statistical comparison of measurements (between the blind CFR and the actual face) was also achieved, revealing that some anthropological distances were constantly underestimated or overestimated. This experiment shows that a thorough anthropological, odontological, and X-ray analysis is indispensable before performing a CFR, and these encouraging results justify further efforts of research in this field.
这项工作的目的是通过25个对照案例来评估颅面重建(CFR)的准确性。本文评估了三种盲法颅面重建方案(从A到C,复杂性递增),以便将颅面重建结果与死者的真实面部进行比较。整体结果显示,在25个案例中,有9个案例的盲法颅面重建与受试者真实面部达到了极佳、良好或中等程度的相似,但颅面重建从A方案到C方案的成功率逐渐提高,在C方案中8个案例中有6个成功。还对(盲法颅面重建与真实面部之间的)测量数据进行了统计学比较,结果显示一些人类学距离经常被低估或高估。该实验表明,在进行颅面重建之前,全面的人类学、牙科学和X射线分析是必不可少的,这些令人鼓舞的结果证明了该领域进一步研究的合理性。