Suppr超能文献

宫颈环扎术预防流产:个体患者数据的荟萃分析。

Cervical stitch (cerclage) for preventing pregnancy loss: individual patient data meta-analysis.

作者信息

Jorgensen A L, Alfirevic Z, Tudur Smith C, Williamson P R

机构信息

Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2007 Dec;114(12):1460-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01515.x. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several observational studies have claimed high success rates for cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency. A recent Cochrane review found no conclusive evidence of benefit, although significant heterogeneity was present for some of the important clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

We undertook an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to examine effect of cerclage on neonatal and maternal outcomes. In an attempt to explain the heterogeneity, we investigated whether obstetric factors including multiple gestation are associated with effectiveness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search methods described in the original Cochrane review were adopted and updated to December 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This IPD systematic review and meta-analysis was of randomised trials comparing cervical cerclage during pregnancy with expectant management or no cerclage in women with confirmed or suspected as having cervical insufficiency.

ANALYSIS

Multilevel logistic regression models stratified by trial with random treatment effects were fitted to investigate the impact of obstetric factors and multiple gestation on treatment effect. Primary outcome measures were pregnancy loss or death before discharge from hospital and absence of neonatal morbidity.

MAIN RESULTS

The meta-analysis included seven trials and 2091 randomised women. In singleton pregnancies, the reduction in pregnancy loss or death before discharge from hospital following cerclage failed to reach statistical significance (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.60-1.10). Cerclage was found to have a detrimental effect on the outcome of pregnancy loss or death before discharge from hospital in multiple gestations (OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.14-30.19), although only a small number of multiple pregnancies were included in the analysis. Neither indication for cerclage nor obstetric history was found to have a statistically significant impact on the effect of cerclage.

CONCLUSIONS

Cerclage may reduce the risk of pregnancy loss or neonatal death before discharge from hospital in singleton pregnancies thought to be at risk of preterm birth, but further large trials are needed to elucidate the risk-benefit ratio precisely. Cerclage in multiple pregnancies should be avoided. The efficacy of cerclage was not influenced by either indication for cerclage or mother's obstetric history.

摘要

背景

多项观察性研究称宫颈环扎术在宫颈机能不全的女性中成功率很高。最近一项Cochrane综述未发现明确的获益证据,尽管某些重要临床结局存在显著异质性。

目的

我们进行了一项个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,以研究宫颈环扎术对新生儿和产妇结局的影响。为了解释异质性,我们调查了包括多胎妊娠在内的产科因素是否与有效性相关。

检索策略

采用并更新了原始Cochrane综述中描述的检索方法,检索至2005年12月。

选择标准

这项IPD系统综述和荟萃分析纳入了随机对照试验,这些试验比较了孕期宫颈环扎术与期待治疗或对确诊或疑似宫颈机能不全的女性不进行环扎术的效果。

分析

采用按试验分层并具有随机治疗效应的多水平逻辑回归模型,以研究产科因素和多胎妊娠对治疗效果的影响。主要结局指标为出院前的妊娠丢失或死亡以及无新生儿发病。

主要结果

荟萃分析纳入了7项试验和2091名随机分组的女性。在单胎妊娠中,宫颈环扎术后出院前妊娠丢失或死亡的减少未达到统计学显著性(比值比0.81;95%置信区间0.60 - 1.10)。尽管分析中纳入的多胎妊娠数量较少,但发现宫颈环扎术对多胎妊娠出院前妊娠丢失或死亡的结局有不利影响(比值比5.88;95%置信区间1.14 - 30.19)。未发现宫颈环扎术的指征或产科病史对宫颈环扎术的效果有统计学显著影响。

结论

宫颈环扎术可能会降低被认为有早产风险的单胎妊娠出院前妊娠丢失或新生儿死亡的风险,但需要进一步的大型试验来精确阐明风险效益比。应避免对多胎妊娠进行宫颈环扎术。宫颈环扎术的疗效不受宫颈环扎术指征或母亲产科病史的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验