Liggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Healthy Mothers, Babies and Children, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD003935. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003935.pub5.
Infants born preterm (before 37 weeks' gestation) are at risk of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and need for respiratory support due to lung immaturity. One course of prenatal corticosteroids, administered to women at risk of preterm birth, reduces the risk of respiratory morbidity and improves survival of their infants, but these benefits do not extend beyond seven days. Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids have been used for women at ongoing risk of preterm birth more than seven days after their first course of corticosteroids, with improvements in respiratory outcomes, but uncertainty remains about any long-term benefits and harms. This is an update of a review last published in 2015.
To assess the effectiveness and safety, using the best available evidence, of a repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids, given to women who remain at risk of preterm birth seven or more days after an initial course of prenatal corticosteroids with the primary aim of reducing fetal and neonatal mortality and morbidity.
For this update, we searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and reference lists of retrieved studies.
Randomised controlled trials, including cluster-randomised trials, of women who had already received one course of corticosteroids seven or more days previously and were still at risk of preterm birth, randomised to further dose(s) or no repeat doses, with or without placebo. Quasi-randomised trials were excluded. Abstracts were accepted if they met specific criteria. All trials had to meet criteria for trustworthiness, including a search of the Retraction Watch database for retractions or expressions of concern about the trials or their publications.
We used standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth methods. Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed trial quality and scientific integrity. We chose primary outcomes based on clinical importance as measures of effectiveness and safety, including serious outcomes, for the women and their fetuses/infants, infants in early childhood (age two to less than five years), the infant in mid- to late childhood (age five to less than 18 years) and the infant as an adult. We assessed risk of bias at the outcome level using the RoB 2 tool and assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE.
We included 11 trials (4895 women and 5975 babies). High-certainty evidence from these trials indicated that treatment of women who remain at risk of preterm birth seven or more days after an initial course of prenatal corticosteroids with repeat dose(s) of corticosteroids, compared with no repeat corticosteroid treatment, reduced the risk of their infants experiencing the primary infant outcome of RDS (risk ratio (RR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.90; 3540 babies; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 16, 95% CI 11 to 29) and had little or no effect on chronic lung disease (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.22; 5661 babies). Moderate-certainty evidence indicated that the composite of serious infant outcomes was probably reduced with repeat dose(s) of corticosteroids (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.97; 9 trials, 5736 babies; NNTB 39, 95% CI 24 to 158), as was severe lung disease (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97; NNTB 45, 95% CI 27 to 256; 4955 babies). Moderate-certainty evidence could not exclude benefit or harm for fetal or neonatal or infant death less than one year of age (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.24; 5849 babies), severe intraventricular haemorrhage (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.86; 5066 babies) and necrotising enterocolitis (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.22; 5736 babies). In women, moderate-certainty evidence found little or no effect on the likelihood of a caesarean birth (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.09; 4266 mothers). Benefit or harm could not be excluded for maternal death (RR 0.32, 95% 0.01 to 7.81; 437 women) and maternal sepsis (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.39; 4666 mothers). The evidence was unclear for risk of adverse effects and discontinuation of therapy due to maternal adverse effects. No trials reported breastfeeding status at hospital discharge or risk of admission to the intensive care unit. At early childhood follow-up, moderate- to high-certainty evidence identified little or no effect of exposure to repeat prenatal corticosteroids compared with no repeat corticosteroids for primary outcomes relating to neurodevelopment (neurodevelopmental impairment: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.10; 3616 children), survival without neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04; 3845 children) and survival without major neurodevelopmental impairment (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.05; 1816 children). An increase or decrease in the risk of death since randomisation could not be excluded (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.40; 5 trials, 4565 babies randomised). At mid-childhood follow-up, moderate-certainty evidence identified little or no effect of exposure to repeat prenatal corticosteroids compared with no repeat corticosteroids on survival free of neurocognitive impairment (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.08; 963 children) or survival free of major neurocognitive impairment (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.04; 2682 children). Benefit or harm could not be excluded for death since randomisation (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.26; 2874 babies randomised) and any neurocognitive impairment (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.29; 897 children). No trials reported data for follow-up into adolescence or adulthood. Risk of bias across outcomes was generally low although there were some concerns of bias. For childhood follow-up, most outcomes had some concerns of risk of bias due to missing data from loss to follow-up.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The short-term benefits for babies included less respiratory distress and fewer serious health problems in the first few weeks after birth with repeat dose(s) of prenatal corticosteroids for women still at risk of preterm birth seven days or more after an initial course. The current available evidence reassuringly shows no significant harm for the women or child in early and mid-childhood, although no benefit. Further research is needed on the long-term benefits and risks for the baby into adulthood.
早产儿(妊娠 37 周前)存在呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)和呼吸支持需求的风险,这是由于肺部不成熟。对有早产风险的女性给予一疗程产前皮质类固醇,可以降低呼吸发病率和改善婴儿存活率,但这些益处不会超过七天。对于在第一次皮质类固醇疗程后七天以上仍有早产风险的女性,已经使用了重复剂量的产前皮质类固醇,以改善呼吸结局,但长期获益和危害仍存在不确定性。这是对 2015 年发表的一篇综述的更新。
使用最佳现有证据评估重复剂量(一剂或多剂)产前皮质类固醇对仍有早产风险的女性的有效性和安全性,主要目的是降低胎儿和新生儿的死亡率和发病率。
对于本次更新,我们检索了 Cochrane 妊娠和分娩组的试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)和检索研究的参考文献列表。
随机对照试验,包括有早产风险的女性在七天前已经接受了一疗程皮质类固醇且仍有早产风险的群组随机对照试验,随机分配到进一步剂量或无重复剂量,有无安慰剂。排除准随机试验。如果符合特定标准,我们也会接受摘要。所有试验都必须符合可信度标准,包括检索撤稿观察数据库,以获取关于试验或其出版物的撤稿或表达关注的信息。
我们使用了 Cochrane 妊娠和分娩组的标准方法。两名综述作者独立选择试验、提取数据,并评估试验质量和科学完整性。我们根据临床重要性选择了主要结局,作为有效性和安全性的衡量标准,包括妇女及其胎儿/婴儿、婴儿早期(2 至 5 岁)、婴儿中期(5 至 18 岁)和婴儿成年后的严重结局。我们使用 RoB 2 工具评估结局水平的偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估证据的确定性。
我们纳入了 11 项试验(4895 名妇女和 5975 名婴儿)。这些试验的高确定性证据表明,与不重复皮质类固醇治疗相比,对仍有早产风险的女性给予重复剂量(一剂或多剂)皮质类固醇治疗,降低了婴儿发生 RDS 的主要婴儿结局(风险比(RR)0.82,95%置信区间(CI)0.74 至 0.90;3540 名婴儿;额外获益的需要治疗数(NNTB)16,95% CI 11 至 29)和慢性肺部疾病(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.83 至 1.22;5661 名婴儿)的可能性较小或没有影响。中等确定性证据表明,重复剂量皮质类固醇可能降低了严重婴儿结局的复合发生率(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.80 至 0.97;9 项试验,5736 名婴儿;NNTB 39,95% CI 24 至 158),严重肺部疾病(RR 0.83,95% CI 0.72 至 0.97;NNTB 45,95% CI 27 至 256;4955 名婴儿)也是如此。中等确定性证据不能排除重复剂量皮质类固醇对一岁以下胎儿/新生儿或婴儿死亡(RR 0.95,95% CI 0.73 至 1.24;5849 名婴儿)、严重脑室出血(RR 1.13,95% CI 0.69 至 1.86;5066 名婴儿)和坏死性小肠结肠炎(RR 0.84,95% CI 0.59 至 1.22;5736 名婴儿)的获益或危害。在妇女中,中等确定性证据表明重复剂量皮质类固醇对剖宫产分娩的可能性影响不大(RR 1.03,95% CI 0.98 至 1.09;4266 名母亲)。母亲死亡(RR 0.32,95% CI 0.01 至 7.81;437 名妇女)和母亲败血症(RR 1.13,95% CI 0.93 至 1.39;4666 名母亲)的获益或危害不能排除。由于母亲的不良反应而停药的风险的不良反应和由于母亲不良反应而停药的风险的证据不清楚。没有试验报告出院时或入住重症监护病房时的母乳喂养情况。在早期儿童随访中,中至高度确定性证据表明,与不重复皮质类固醇相比,重复产前皮质类固醇暴露对与神经发育相关的主要结局(神经发育障碍:RR 0.97,95% CI 0.85 至 1.10;3616 名儿童)、无神经发育障碍的存活率(RR 1.01,95% CI 0.98 至 1.04;3845 名儿童)和无重大神经发育障碍的存活率(RR 1.02,95% CI 0.98 至 1.05;1816 名儿童)没有明显影响。不能排除随机分组后死亡风险的增加或减少(RR 1.06,95% CI 0.81 至 1.40;5 项试验,4565 名婴儿随机分组)。在儿童中期随访中,中等确定性证据表明,与不重复皮质类固醇相比,重复产前皮质类固醇暴露对无神经认知障碍的存活率(RR 1.01,95% CI 0.95 至 1.08;963 名儿童)或无重大神经认知障碍的存活率(RR 1.00,95% CI 0.97 至 1.04;2682 名儿童)没有明显影响。不能排除随机分组后死亡(RR 0.93,95% CI 0.69 至 1.26;2874 名婴儿随机分组)和任何神经认知障碍(RR 0.96,95% CI 0.72 至 1.29;897 名儿童)的风险。没有试验报告随访到青春期或成年期的数据。对于儿童随访,由于失访导致的资料缺失,大多数结局的偏倚风险存在一些担忧。
对于有早产风险的女性,重复剂量的产前皮质类固醇可以降低婴儿在出生后的前几周内发生呼吸窘迫和其他严重健康问题的风险。目前的可用证据令人欣慰地表明,在婴儿早期和中期,重复剂量的产前皮质类固醇对女性和儿童没有明显的危害,但也没有益处。需要进一步研究这种治疗方法对婴儿的长期益处和风险。