Li Fang, Wang Qian, Yao Gui Hua, Zhang Peng Fei, Ge Zhi Ming, Zhang Mei, Zhang Yun
Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research, Chinese Ministry of Education and Chinese Ministry of Health, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Shandong, P. R. China.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008 Jan;34(1):40-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.07.012. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
Real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (RT-3DE) has emerged as a new technique in measuring left atrial and ventricular volume. However, the impact of cutting planes of RT-3DE on the accuracy of volume measurement in patients with a normal or enlarged heart is still unknown. We enrolled 30 normal subjects (control group) and 30 patients with heart failure (patient group). RT-3DE was performed to measure maximal volume of the left atrium (LAVmax) and left ventricular end-diastole volume (LVEDV) with 2-, 4-, 8- and 16-cutting planes, compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI). In both groups, LAVmax by RT-3DE using 2- and 4-cutting planes was significantly underestimated (mean difference: -10.4 +/- 16.6 mL, p = 0.001 and -8.8 +/- 14.2 mL, p = 0.002 in the control group and -13.4 +/- 19.6 mL, p = 0.001 and -11.2 +/- 17.5 mL, p = 0.001 in the patient group, respectively). These differences became nonsignificant when 8- and 16-cutting planes were adopted (mean difference: -2.1 +/- 7.6 mL and -1.9 +/- 7.4 mL in the control group and -2.7 +/- 8.4 mL and -2.2 +/- 8.3 mL in the patient group, respectively). The agreement for LVEDV was acceptable when 4- or more cutting planes were used in the control group and when 8- or 16-cutting planes were used in the patient group. The time expense for data analysis of LAVmax with 8-image planes was only 7 +/- 4 min in the control group and 6 +/- 5 min in the patient group, almost halving that of the 16-image planes. Similarly, 4- and 8-cutting planes were required for an accurate measurement of LVEDV in the control and patient groups, respectively. In conclusion, RT-3DE with 8-cutting planes is both accurate and timesaving for measurement of LAVmax and LVEDV in patients with normal or enlarged left atria and ventricles.
实时三维(3D)超声心动图(RT - 3DE)已成为测量左心房和心室容积的一项新技术。然而,RT - 3DE的切割平面对于正常心脏或扩大心脏患者容积测量准确性的影响仍不清楚。我们纳入了30名正常受试者(对照组)和30名心力衰竭患者(患者组)。采用RT - 3DE,通过2个、4个、8个和16个切割平面测量左心房最大容积(LAVmax)和左心室舒张末期容积(LVEDV),并与心脏磁共振成像(CMRI)进行比较。在两组中,使用2个和4个切割平面时,RT - 3DE测量的LAVmax均显著低估(对照组平均差异:-10.4±16.6 mL,p = 0.001和-8.8±14.2 mL,p = 0.002;患者组分别为-13.4±19.6 mL,p = 0.001和-11.2±17.5 mL,p = 0.001)。当采用8个和16个切割平面时,这些差异变得不显著(对照组平均差异:-2.1±7.6 mL和-1.9±7.4 mL;患者组分别为-2.7±8.4 mL和-2.2±8.3 mL)。在对照组中使用4个或更多切割平面以及在患者组中使用8个或16个切割平面时,LVEDV的一致性是可接受的。对照组中使用8个图像平面分析LAVmax的数据时间仅为7±4分钟,患者组为6±5分钟,几乎是16个图像平面所需时间的一半。同样,对照组和患者组分别需要4个和8个切割平面来准确测量LVEDV。总之,对于左心房和心室正常或扩大的患者而言,采用8个切割平面的RT - 3DE在测量LAVmax和LVEDV时既准确又省时。