Chuang Michael L, Salton Carol J, Hibberd Mark G, Manning Warren J, Douglas Pamela S
Charles A. Dana Research Institute and the Harvard-Thorndike Laboratory of the Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2007 May 1;99(9):1321-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.12.045. Epub 2007 Mar 16.
Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) allows the accurate determination of left ventricular (LV) mass, but the optimal number of component or extracted 2-dimensional (2D) image planes that should be used to calculate LV mass is not known. This study was performed to determine the relation between the number of 2D image planes used for 3DE and the accuracy of LV mass, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging as the reference standard. Three-dimensional echocardiography data sets were analyzed using 4, 6, 8, 10 and 20 component 2D planes as well as biplane 2D echocardiography and CMR in 25 subjects with a variety of LV pathologies. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Bland-Altman method were used to compare measures of LV mass. To further assess the potential clinical impact of reducing the number of component image planes used for 3DE, the number of discrepancies between CMR and each of the 3DE estimates of LV mass at prespecified levels (i.e., > or =5%, > or =10%, and > or =20% difference from CMR LV mass) was tabulated. The mean LV mass by magnetic resonance imaging was 177 +/- 56 g (range 91 to 316). Biplane 2-dimensional echocardiography significantly underestimated CMR LV mass (p <0.05), but LV mass by 3DE was not statistically different from that by CMR regardless of the number of planes used. However, error variability and Bland-Altman 95% confidence intervals decreased with the use of additional image planes. In conclusion, transthoracic 3DE measures LV mass more accurately than biplane 2-dimensional echocardiography when > or =6 component 2D image planes are used. The use of >6 planes further increases the accuracy of 3DE, but at the cost of greater analysis time and potentially increased scanning times.
三维超声心动图(3DE)可准确测定左心室(LV)质量,但用于计算LV质量的最佳二维(2D)图像平面数量尚不清楚。本研究旨在以心血管磁共振(CMR)成像作为参考标准,确定用于3DE的2D图像平面数量与LV质量准确性之间的关系。对25例患有各种LV病变的受试者,使用4、6、8、10和20个二维平面以及双平面二维超声心动图和CMR分析三维超声心动图数据集。采用重复测量方差分析和Bland-Altman方法比较LV质量测量值。为进一步评估减少用于3DE的二维图像平面数量的潜在临床影响,将CMR与每个预先指定水平(即与CMR LV质量相差≥5%、≥10%和≥20%)的3DE LV质量估计值之间的差异数量制成表格。磁共振成像测得的平均LV质量为177±56 g(范围91至316)。双平面二维超声心动图显著低估了CMR LV质量(p<0.05),但无论使用的平面数量如何,3DE测得的LV质量与CMR测得的LV质量无统计学差异。然而,随着使用更多图像平面,误差变异性和Bland-Altman 95%置信区间减小。总之,当使用≥6个二维图像平面时,经胸3DE测量LV质量比双平面二维超声心动图更准确。使用>6个平面可进一步提高3DE的准确性,但代价是分析时间更长且扫描时间可能增加。