Suppr超能文献

谷物种植中微生物暴露的决定因素。

Determinants of microbial exposure in grain farming.

作者信息

Halstensen A S, Nordby K C, Wouters I M, Eduard W

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Biological Working Environment, National Institute of Occupational Health, PO Box 8149 Dep., N-0033 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Oct;51(7):581-92. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mem038. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Exposure to organic dust containing high concentrations of microorganisms is common in grain farming, although the farmers have practices to counteract microbial growth to obtain optimal grain yields. We investigated the influence of weather and production practices on personal microbial exposure during grain work.

METHODS

Airborne dust was collected by personal sampling during threshing and storage work on 92 Norwegian farms. The personal exposure for bacteria, endotoxin, fungal spores and hyphae, beta-(1-->3)-glucans and actinomycetes was quantified and compared with climatic data expressed as fungal forecasts from the grain growth season and production practices as reported by farmers.

RESULTS

Farmers were exposed to a geometrical mean of 4.4 mg m(-3) inhalable dust [geometrical standard deviation (GSD) = 4.0], 4 x 10(6) m(-3) bacteria and fungal spores (GSD = 5.2 and 5.9, respectively), 5.9 x 10(3) EU m(-3) of endotoxins (GSD = 8.6), 2 x 10(5) m(-3) actinomycetes (GSD = 15.3), 120 mug m(-3) beta-(1-->3)-glucans (GSD = 4.7) and 5 x 10(5) AU m(-3) of hyphae (GSD = 4.4). Univariate associations were found between one or several of these microbial factors and work operation, visible fungal damage, grain species, lodging of grain, storage technology or harvester type. As assessed by general linear models, storage work was the main predictive determinant for microbial exposure, although grain species and visible fungal damage also were also important. Wet and warm weather throughout the grain growth season were associated with elevated exposure for inhalable dust, beta-(1-->3)-glucans, endotoxins and hyphae during threshing. The beta-(1-->3)-glucan exposure could biologically be explained by the fungal spore and hyphal exposure, both variables contributing equally. However, spores were most important during storage work, whereas only hyphae were predictive during threshing.

CONCLUSIONS

Farmers were exposed to high levels of microorganisms and their components during dusty grain work. Dust prevention and protection may reduce microbial exposure, and may be particularly important in areas with frequent fungal forecasts, when fungal damage has been observed, during storage work or when handling barley.

摘要

目的

尽管农民采取了抑制微生物生长以获得最佳谷物产量的措施,但在谷物种植过程中,接触含有高浓度微生物的有机粉尘仍很常见。我们调查了天气和生产实践对谷物作业期间个人微生物暴露的影响。

方法

在挪威92个农场的脱粒和储存作业期间,通过个人采样收集空气中的粉尘。对细菌、内毒素、真菌孢子和菌丝、β-(1→3)-葡聚糖和放线菌的个人暴露量进行了量化,并与谷物生长季节的真菌预报所表示的气候数据以及农民报告的生产实践进行了比较。

结果

农民接触的可吸入粉尘几何平均值为4.4毫克/立方米[几何标准差(GSD)=4.0],细菌和真菌孢子分别为4×10⁶/立方米(GSD分别为5.2和5.9),内毒素为5.9×10³欧盟单位/立方米(GSD = 8.6),放线菌为2×10⁵/立方米(GSD = 15.3),β-(1→3)-葡聚糖为120微克/立方米(GSD = 4.7),菌丝为5×10⁵奥氏单位/立方米(GSD = 4.4)。在这些微生物因素中的一个或几个与作业操作、可见真菌损害、谷物品种、谷物倒伏、储存技术或收割机类型之间发现了单变量关联。通过一般线性模型评估,储存作业是微生物暴露的主要预测决定因素,尽管谷物品种和可见真菌损害也很重要。整个谷物生长季节潮湿温暖的天气与脱粒期间可吸入粉尘、β-(

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验