• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

彻底清除:一项词汇语义探索。

Wiping the slate clean: a lexical semantic exploration.

作者信息

Levin B, Hovav M R

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208-4090.

出版信息

Cognition. 1991 Dec;41(1-3):123-51. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90034-2.

DOI:10.1016/0010-0277(91)90034-2
PMID:1790652
Abstract

This paper presents a case study in lexical semantic analysis aimed at uncovering syntactically relevant components of verb meaning. Our strategy is to investigate the nature of the lexical knowledge that a speaker of English possesses with respect to certain apparently semantically related verbs: a set of verbs that might as a first approximation be classed as verbs of removal. However, a closer examination of these apparently semantically related verbs reveals that their syntactic properties diverge. An exploration of the patterns of behavior of the verbs suggests that the initial class includes three linguistically significant subclasses. The components of meaning that are relevant to characterizing each subclass are identified by isolating those components of meaning that the members of each subclass share. The conclusion considers the implications of the meaning components identified in this study for a lexical semantic representation.

摘要

本文呈现了一个词汇语义分析的案例研究,旨在揭示动词意义中与句法相关的成分。我们的策略是研究英语使用者关于某些表面上语义相关动词所拥有的词汇知识的本质:一组乍一看可归为去除类动词的动词。然而,对这些表面上语义相关动词的仔细考察表明,它们的句法属性存在差异。对这些动词行为模式的探究表明,最初的类别包含三个具有语言学意义的子类。通过分离每个子类成员共有的意义成分,确定了与刻画每个子类相关的意义成分。结论部分考虑了本研究中确定的意义成分对词汇语义表征的影响。

相似文献

1
Wiping the slate clean: a lexical semantic exploration.彻底清除:一项词汇语义探索。
Cognition. 1991 Dec;41(1-3):123-51. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90034-2.
2
Affectedness and direct objects: the role of lexical semantics in the acquisition of verb argument structure.受影响性与直接宾语:词汇语义在动词论元结构习得中的作用。
Cognition. 1991 Dec;41(1-3):153-95. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(91)90035-3.
3
Psycholinguistic measures for German verb pairs: Semantic transparency, semantic relatedness, verb family size, and age of reading acquisition.德语动词对的心理语言学测量指标:语义透明度、语义相关性、动词家族大小和阅读习得年龄。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1540-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1052-5.
4
On the semantic content of subcategorization frames.论次范畴化框架的语义内容。
Cogn Psychol. 1991 Jul;23(3):331-92. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90013-e.
5
Componential Analysis of English Verbs.英语动词的成分分析
Front Artif Intell. 2022 May 30;5:780385. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.780385. eCollection 2022.
6
Effects of relative embodiment in lexical and semantic processing of verbs.相对具身性对动词词汇和语义加工的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Mar 22.
7
Can word formation be understood or understanded by semantics alone?词的构成能仅通过语义来理解吗? (注:原句中“understanded”使用错误,正确形式应为“understood” )
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Feb;56(1):30-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.02.002. Epub 2007 May 10.
8
The influence of semantic and morphological complexity of verbs on sentence recall: Implications for the nature of conceptual representation and category-specific deficits.动词的语义和形态复杂性对句子回忆的影响:对概念表征性质和特定类别缺陷的启示。
Brain Cogn. 2005 Mar;57(2):168-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.039.
9
The role of semantic features in verb processing.语义特征在动词加工中的作用。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008 May;37(3):199-217. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9066-7.
10
Can we separate verbs from their argument structure? A group study in aphasia.我们能否将动词与其论元结构分开?一项失语症群体研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jan;52(1):59-70. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12253. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Manner/result polysemy as contextual allosemy: Evidence from Daakaka.作为语境异体的方式/结果多义性:来自达卡卡语的证据。
Nat Lang Linguist Theory. 2025;43(1):273-330. doi: 10.1007/s11049-024-09616-6. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
2
The Geometry and Dynamics of Meaning.意义的几何学与动力学
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Jan;17(1):34-56. doi: 10.1111/tops.12767. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
3
Crying helps, but being sad doesn't: Infants constrain nominal reference online using known verbs, but not known adjectives.哭泣有帮助,但悲伤没有用:婴儿在线使用已知动词限制名词参照,但不使用已知形容词。
Cognition. 2019 Dec;193:104033. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104033. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
4
The syntactic and semantic features of two-year-olds' verb vocabularies: a comparison of typically developing children and late talkers.两岁儿童动词词汇的句法和语义特征:正常发育儿童与晚说话者的比较。
J Child Lang. 2019 May;46(3):409-432. doi: 10.1017/S0305000918000508. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Semantic detail in the developing verb lexicon: An extension of Naigles and Kako (1993).动词词汇发展中的语义细节:对奈格尔和加藤(1993)的扩展。
Dev Sci. 2019 Jan;22(1):e12697. doi: 10.1111/desc.12697. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
6
Speaking of death.说到死亡。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Sep 5;373(1754). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0172.
7
Standardized stimuli and procedures for investigating the retrieval of lexical and conceptual knowledge for actions.用于研究动作词汇和概念知识提取的标准化刺激和程序。
Mem Cognit. 1997 Jul;25(4):543-69. doi: 10.3758/bf03201129.