Hurley M V, Walsh N E, Mitchell H L, Pimm T J, Patel A, Williamson E, Jones R H, Dieppe P A, Reeves B C
King's College London, London, UK.
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1211-9. doi: 10.1002/art.22995.
Chronic knee pain is a major cause of disability and health care expenditure, but there are concerns about efficacy, cost, and side effects associated with usual primary care. Conservative rehabilitation may offer a safe, effective, affordable alternative. We compared the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program integrating exercise, self-management, and active coping strategies (Enabling Self-management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain through Exercise [ESCAPE-knee pain]) with usual primary care in improving functioning in persons with chronic knee pain.
We conducted a single-blind, pragmatic, cluster randomized controlled trial. Participants age >/=50 years, reporting knee pain for >6 months, were recruited from 54 inner-city primary care practices. Primary care practices were randomized to continued usual primary care (i.e., whatever intervention a participant's primary care physician deemed appropriate), usual primary care plus the rehabilitation program delivered to individual participants, or usual primary care plus the rehabilitation program delivered to groups of 8 participants. The primary outcome was self-reported functioning (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index physical functioning [WOMAC-func]) 6 months after completing rehabilitation.
A total of 418 participants were recruited; 76 (18%) withdrew, only 5 (1%) due to adverse events. Rehabilitated participants had better functioning than participants continuing usual primary care (-3.33 difference in WOMAC-func score; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -5.88, -0.78; P = 0.01). Improvements were similar whether participants received individual rehabilitation (-3.53; 95% CI -6.52, -0.55) or group rehabilitation (-3.16; 95% CI -6.55, -0.12).
ESCAPE-knee pain provides a safe, relatively brief intervention for chronic knee pain that is equally effective whether delivered to individuals or groups of participants.
慢性膝关节疼痛是导致残疾和医疗保健支出的主要原因,但人们对常规初级保健的疗效、成本和副作用存在担忧。保守康复治疗可能提供一种安全、有效且经济实惠的替代方案。我们比较了一项整合运动、自我管理和积极应对策略的康复计划(通过运动实现自我管理和应对膝关节炎疼痛[ESCAPE-膝关节疼痛])与常规初级保健在改善慢性膝关节疼痛患者功能方面的效果。
我们进行了一项单盲、实用、整群随机对照试验。从54个市中心初级保健机构招募年龄≥50岁、报告膝关节疼痛超过6个月的参与者。初级保健机构被随机分配为继续常规初级保健(即参与者的初级保健医生认为合适的任何干预措施)、常规初级保健加为个体参与者提供的康复计划,或常规初级保健加为8名参与者一组提供的康复计划。主要结局是完成康复6个月后自我报告的功能(西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数身体功能[WOMAC-功能])。
共招募了418名参与者;76人(18%)退出,仅5人(1%)因不良事件退出。接受康复治疗的参与者比继续接受常规初级保健的参与者功能更好(WOMAC-功能评分差异为-3.33;95%置信区间[95%CI]-5.88,-0.78;P=0.01)。无论参与者接受个体康复治疗(-3.53;95%CI-6.52,-0.55)还是团体康复治疗(-3.16;95%CI-6.55,-0.12),改善情况相似。
ESCAPE-膝关节疼痛为慢性膝关节疼痛提供了一种安全、相对简短的干预措施,无论是针对个体还是参与者群体,其效果均相同。