Suppr超能文献

一项为期12周的慢性膝关节疼痛数字护理计划对疼痛、活动能力和手术风险的影响:随机对照试验。

Effects of a 12-Week Digital Care Program for Chronic Knee Pain on Pain, Mobility, and Surgery Risk: Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Mecklenburg Gabriel, Smittenaar Peter, Erhart-Hledik Jennifer C, Perez Daniel A, Hunter Simon

机构信息

Hinge Health, Inc, San Francisco, CA, United States.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Apr 25;20(4):e156. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9667.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic knee pain, most commonly caused by knee osteoarthritis, is a prevalent condition which in most cases can be effectively treated through conservative, non-surgical care involving exercise therapy, education, psychosocial support, and weight loss. However, most people living with chronic knee pain do not receive adequate care, leading to unnecessary use of opiates and surgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the efficacy of a remotely delivered digital care program for chronic knee pain.

METHODS

We enrolled 162 participants into a randomized controlled trial between January and March 2017. Participants were recruited from participating employers using questionnaires for self-assessment of their knee pain, and randomized into treatment (n=101) and control (n=61) groups. Participants in the treatment group were enrolled in the Hinge Health digital care program for chronic knee pain. This is a remotely delivered, home-based 12-week intervention that includes sensor-guided exercise therapy, education, cognitive behavioral therapy, weight loss, and psychosocial support through a personal coach and team-based interactions. The control group received three education pieces regarding self-care for chronic knee pain. Both groups had access to treatment-as-usual. The primary outcome was the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Pain subscale and KOOS Physical Function Shortform (KOOS-PS). Secondary outcomes were visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and stiffness respectively, surgery intent, and self-reported understanding of the condition and treatment options. Outcome measures were analyzed by intention to treat (excluding 7 control participants who received the digital care program due to administrative error) and per protocol.

RESULTS

In an intent-to-treat analysis the digital care program group had a significantly greater reduction in KOOS Pain compared to the control group at the end of the program (greater reduction of 7.7, 95% CI 3.0 to 12.3, P=.002), as well as a significantly greater improvement in physical function (7.2, 95% CI 3.0 to 11.5, P=.001). This was also reflected in the secondary outcomes VAS pain (12.3, 95% CI 5.4 to 19.1, P<.001) and VAS stiffness (13.4, 95% CI 5.6 to 21.1, P=.001). Participants' self-reported likelihood (from 0% to 100%) of having surgery also reduced more strongly in the digital care program group compared to the control group over the next 1 year (-9.4 percentage points, pp, 95% CI -16.6 to -2.2, P=.01), 2 years (-11.3 pp, 95% CI -20.1 to -2.5, P=.01), and 5 years (-14.6 pp, 95% CI -23.6 to -5.5, P=.002). Interest in surgery (from 0 to 10) also reduced more so in the digital care program compared to control group (-1.0, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.2, P=.01). Participants' understanding of the condition and treatment options (on a scale from 0 to 4) increased more substantially for participants in the digital care program than those in the control group (0.9, 95% CI 0.6 to 1.3, P<.001). In an analysis on participants that completed the intervention (per protocol analysis) all primary and secondary outcomes remained significant at greater effect magnitudes compared to intention to treat, with those completing the program showing a 61% (95% CI 48 to 74) reduction in VAS pain compared to 21% (95% CI 5 to 38) in the control group (P<.001). Accounting for the cost of administering the program, we estimate net cost savings on surgery alone of US $4340 over 1 year and $7900 over 5 years for those participants completing the digital care program compared to those in the control group receiving treatment-as-usual. In an exploratory subgroup analysis including only participants exhibiting clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis the program proved equally effective.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial provides strong evidence that a comprehensive 12-week digital care program for chronic knee pain, including osteoarthritis, yields significantly improved outcomes for pain, physical function, stiffness, surgery risk, and understanding of the condition, compared to a control group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 13307390; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13307390 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6ycwjGL73).

摘要

背景

慢性膝关节疼痛最常见的病因是膝骨关节炎,这是一种普遍存在的疾病,在大多数情况下,可以通过包括运动疗法、教育、心理社会支持和减肥在内的保守非手术治疗得到有效治疗。然而,大多数患有慢性膝关节疼痛的人没有得到充分的治疗,导致阿片类药物和手术程序的不必要使用。

目的

评估远程提供的慢性膝关节疼痛数字护理计划的疗效。

方法

2017年1月至3月,我们招募了162名参与者进行一项随机对照试验。通过问卷调查从参与的雇主中招募参与者,以自我评估他们的膝关节疼痛情况,并随机分为治疗组(n = 101)和对照组(n = 61)。治疗组的参与者加入了针对慢性膝关节疼痛的Hinge Health数字护理计划。这是一项远程提供的、基于家庭的为期12周的干预措施,包括传感器引导的运动疗法、教育、认知行为疗法、减肥以及通过个人教练和团队互动提供的心理社会支持。对照组收到了三份关于慢性膝关节疼痛自我护理的教育资料。两组都可以获得常规治疗。主要结局是膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)疼痛子量表和KOOS身体功能简表(KOOS - PS)。次要结局分别是疼痛和僵硬的视觉模拟量表(VAS)、手术意愿以及自我报告的对病情和治疗选择的理解。结局指标通过意向性分析(排除7名因管理错误而接受数字护理计划的对照参与者)和符合方案分析进行分析。

结果

在意向性分析中,与对照组相比,数字护理计划组在计划结束时KOOS疼痛的降低幅度显著更大(降低幅度大7.7,95%CI 3.0至12.3,P = .002),身体功能的改善也显著更大(7.2,95%CI 3.0至11.5,P = .001)。这也反映在次要结局VAS疼痛(12.3,95%CI 5.4至19.1,P < .001)和VAS僵硬(13.4,95%CI 5.6至21.1,P = .001)上。与对照组相比,在接下来的1年(-9.4个百分点,pp,95%CI -16.6至-2.2,P = .01)、2年(-11.3 pp,95%CI -20.1至-2.5,P = .01)和5年(-14.6 pp,95%CI -23.6至-5.5,P = .002)中,数字护理计划组参与者自我报告的手术可能性(从0%到100%)降低幅度也更大。与对照组相比,数字护理计划组对手术的兴趣(从0到10)降低幅度也更大(-1.0,95%CI -1.7至-0.2,P = .01)。与对照组相比,数字护理计划组参与者对病情和治疗选择的理解(从0到4评分)提高幅度更大(0.9,95%CI 0.6至1.3,P < .001)。在对完成干预的参与者进行的分析(符合方案分析)中,所有主要和次要结局与意向性分析相比,在更大的效应量上仍然显著,完成该计划的参与者VAS疼痛降低了61%(95%CI 48至74),而对照组为21%(95%CI 5至38)(P < .001)。考虑到实施该计划的成本,我们估计与接受常规治疗的对照组参与者相比,完成数字护理计划的参与者在1年内仅手术方面的净成本节省为4340美元,5年内为7900美元。在一项仅包括表现出骨关节炎临床症状的参与者进行的探索性子组分析中,该计划同样有效。

结论

该试验提供了有力证据,表明与对照组相比,一项针对包括骨关节炎在内的慢性膝关节疼痛的为期12周的综合数字护理计划在疼痛、身体功能、僵硬、手术风险和对病情的理解方面产生了显著改善的结果。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)13307390;http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13307390(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6ycwjGL73)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3760/5943627/1e83b522aef6/jmir_v20i4e156_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验