Miles L, Bove K E, Lovell D, Wargula J C, Bukulmez H, Shao M, Salisbury S, Bean J A
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Oct 15;57(7):1183-91. doi: 10.1002/art.22993.
Except when the diagnosis of juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) is in doubt, a case has not been made for routine muscle biopsy (MB). We sought to determine whether MB findings prior to systemic therapy have prognostic value.
We reviewed the hospital records and slides prepared from the initial open MB of 72 patients treated at one center between 1977 and 2002 and followed for a minimum of 2 years. None of the patients had received a course of systemic corticosteroid therapy at the time of MB. Our approach to MB evaluation was based on recent discussions with muscle pathology experts to develop criteria for assessing inflammation, vasculopathy, myofiber atrophy, regeneration, acute and chronic myopathic change, and stromal changes. Using simple and multivariate logistic regression, we tested each MB parameter for ability to predict outcome using 2 published classification systems.
Extensive active myopathic changes (excluding regeneration) and central nuclei without basophilia predicted chronic juvenile DM. Severe arteropathic change, positive arterial direct immunofluorescence, obvious foci of severe capillary loss/endomysial fibrosis, and muscle infarcts predicted chronic juvenile DM, particularly with ulceration. Other MB parameters, regardless of severity, were not significant predictors of chronic juvenile DM versus limited disease.
A scoring system for evaluating pretreatment MB in juvenile DM that focuses on extent of necrotizing myopathy, severity of vasculopathy, and features of established chronicity such as central nucleation of nonbasophilic myofibers may provide a basis for stratification of therapeutic regimens according to risk for chronic disease. The validity of our findings should be prospectively tested.
除了对青少年皮肌炎(DM)的诊断存疑时,目前尚无常规肌肉活检(MB)的必要性依据。我们试图确定全身治疗前MB的结果是否具有预后价值。
我们回顾了1977年至2002年间在一个中心接受治疗的72例患者的医院记录以及首次开放性MB制备的玻片,并对其进行了至少2年的随访。在进行MB时,所有患者均未接受过全身皮质类固醇治疗疗程。我们对MB评估的方法基于近期与肌肉病理学专家的讨论,以制定评估炎症、血管病变、肌纤维萎缩、再生、急性和慢性肌病改变以及间质改变的标准。使用简单和多变量逻辑回归,我们使用2种已发表的分类系统测试了每个MB参数预测结果的能力。
广泛的活动性肌病改变(不包括再生)和无嗜碱性的中央核预测为慢性青少年DM。严重的动脉病变、动脉直接免疫荧光阳性、严重毛细血管丢失/肌内膜纤维化的明显病灶以及肌肉梗死预测为慢性青少年DM,尤其是伴有溃疡的情况。其他MB参数,无论严重程度如何,均不是慢性青少年DM与局限性疾病的显著预测指标。
一种用于评估青少年DM治疗前MB的评分系统,重点关注坏死性肌病的程度、血管病变的严重程度以及已确立的慢性特征,如非嗜碱性肌纤维的中央核形成,可能为根据慢性病风险分层治疗方案提供依据。我们研究结果的有效性应进行前瞻性测试。