两种非接触式眼压计的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of two non-contact tonometers.

作者信息

Koopmans S A, Kooijman A C, van Rij G, Eisses J, de Groot-Woltjer J

机构信息

University Eye Clinic, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Doc Ophthalmol. 1991;78(3-4):259-63. doi: 10.1007/BF00165689.

DOI:10.1007/BF00165689

PMID:1790749

Abstract

The precision and speed of two non-contact tonometers were examined and compared. The Goldmann applanation tonometer was used as the standard for precision. On the average the results obtained with the non-contact tonometers were not significantly different from those obtained with the Goldmann tonometer. The variation in the values obtained with the non-contact tonometers was greater. The speed of measurement differed between the two non-contact tonometers.

摘要

对两种非接触眼压计的精度和速度进行了检测和比较。以Goldmann压平眼压计作为精度标准。平均而言，非接触眼压计获得的结果与Goldmann眼压计获得的结果无显著差异。非接触眼压计获得的值的变化更大。两种非接触眼压计的测量速度有所不同。