O'Leary K Daniel, Smith Slep Amy M, O'Leary Susan G
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, State University of New York, NY 11794-2500, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2007 Oct;75(5):752-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.752.
This exploratory study was designed to address how multiple factors drawn from varying focal models and ecological levels of influence might operate relative to each other to predict partner aggression, using data from 453 representatively sampled couples. The resulting cross-validated models predicted approximately 50% of the variance in men's and women's partner aggression. The 3 strongest direct predictors of partner aggression for men and women were dominance/jealousy, marital adjustment, and partner responsibility attributions. Three additional direct paths to aggression for men were exposure to family-of-origin aggression, anger expression, and perceived social support. The 1 additional direct path for women was a history of their own aggression as a child or teenager. Implications for more integrative theories and intervention are discussed.
本探索性研究旨在探讨从不同焦点模型和生态影响水平中提取的多个因素如何相互作用以预测伴侣间的攻击行为，研究使用了来自453对具有代表性的夫妻样本的数据。所得的交叉验证模型预测了男性和女性伴侣攻击行为中约50%的方差。男性和女性伴侣攻击行为最强的三个直接预测因素是支配/嫉妒、婚姻调适和对伴侣责任的归因。男性攻击行为的另外三条直接路径是原生家庭攻击行为的暴露、愤怒表达和感知到的社会支持。女性的另外一条直接路径是其童年或青少年时期自身攻击行为的历史。文中还讨论了对更具综合性的理论和干预措施的启示。
