Fink Klaus
Maria-Louisen-Str. 45a, D-22301 Hamburg, Germany.
Int J Psychoanal. 2007 Oct;88(Pt 5):1263-73. doi: 10.1516/ijpa.2007.1263.
The author discusses supervision, transference and countertransference as seen in the context of the clinical case of a patient who had been first seen as a training analysis case and who later, in a fortuitous way, was treated by the supervisor of the training analysis. The supervisor, who in the first instance did not recognize the patient, discusses the reasons for this unusual experience in terms of the presence and absence of transference during the analysis of this patient as a training case and the problems inherent in the task of supervising. The patient's feelings towards the first and the second analyst and the vicissitudes of transference and countertransference during the supervision of the training analysis and its influence on the presentation of the analytical sessions by the student are also detailed and discussed. The question of recorded supervision presentations and their possible influence on the dynamics of supervision is raised.
作者探讨了在一个临床案例背景下的督导、移情和反移情。该患者最初被视为一个训练分析案例,后来机缘巧合由训练分析的督导进行治疗。这位督导最初并未认出该患者,他从该患者作为训练案例分析期间移情的有无以及督导任务中固有的问题等方面,讨论了这种不同寻常经历的原因。文中还详细阐述并讨论了患者对第一任和第二任分析师的情感,以及训练分析督导期间移情和反移情的变化及其对学生分析过程呈现的影响。此外,还提出了录制督导过程展示内容及其对督导动态可能产生的影响这一问题。