Busch S, Johnson T R C, Wintersperger B J, Minaifar N, Bhargava A, Rist C, Reiser M F, Becker C, Nikolaou K
Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2008 Mar;18(3):570-5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0767-y. Epub 2007 Oct 2.
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography are currently regarded as standard modalities for the quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. With the recent introduction of dual-source computedtomography (DSCT), the increased temporal resolution of 83 ms should also improve the assessment of cardiac function in CT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of DSCT in the assessment of left ventricular functional parameters with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as standard of reference. Fifteen patients (two female, 13 male; mean age 50.8 +/- 19.2 years) underwent CT and MRI examinations on a DSCT (Somatom Definition; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany) and a 3.0-Tesla MR scanner (Magnetom Trio; Siemens Medical Solutions), respectively. Multiphase axial CT images were analysed with a semiautomatic region growing algorithms (Syngo Circulation; Siemens Medical Solutions) by two independent blinded observers. In MRI, dynamic cine loops of short axis slices were evaluated with semiautomatic contour detection software (ARGUS; Siemens Medical Solutions) independently by two readers. End-systolic volume (ESV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) were determined for both modalities, and correlation coefficient, systematic error, limits of agreement and inter-observer variability were assessed. In DSCT, EDV and ESV were 135.8 +/- 41.9 ml and 54.9 +/- 29.6 ml, respectively, compared with 132.1 +/- 40.8 ml EDV and 57.6 +/- 27.3 ml ESV in MRI. Thus, EDV was overestimated by 3.7 ml (limits of agreement -46.1/+53.6), while ESV was underestimated by 2.6 ml (-36.6/+31.4). Mean EF was 61.6 +/- 12.4% in DSCT and 57.9 +/- 9.0% in MRI, resulting in an overestimation of EF by 3.8% with limits of agreement at -14.7 and +22.2%. Rank correlation rho values were 0.81 for EDV (P = 0.0024), 0.79 for ESV (P = 0.0031) and 0.64 for EF (P = 0.0168). The kappa value of inter-observer variability were amounted to 0.85 for EDV, ESV and EF. DSCT offers the possibility to quantify left ventricular function from coronary CT angiography datasets with sufficient diagnostic accuracy, adding to the value of the modality in a comprehensive cardiac assessment. The observed differences in the measured values may be due to different post-processing methods and physiological reactions to contrast material injection without beta-blocker medication.
心脏磁共振成像和超声心动图目前被视为定量评估左心室容积和射血分数的标准方法。随着双源计算机断层扫描(DSCT)的近期引入,其83毫秒的更高时间分辨率也应能改善CT对心脏功能的评估。本研究的目的是以心脏磁共振成像(MRI)作为参考标准,评估DSCT在评估左心室功能参数方面的准确性。15例患者(2例女性,13例男性;平均年龄50.8±19.2岁)分别在一台DSCT(Somatom Definition;西门子医疗解决方案公司,德国福希海姆)和一台3.0特斯拉磁共振扫描仪(Magnetom Trio;西门子医疗解决方案公司)上接受了CT和MRI检查。两名独立的盲法观察者使用半自动区域生长算法(Syngo Circulation;西门子医疗解决方案公司)分析多期轴向CT图像。在MRI中,两名读者分别使用半自动轮廓检测软件(ARGUS;西门子医疗解决方案公司)评估短轴切片的动态电影环。确定了两种检查方法的收缩末期容积(ESV)、舒张末期容积(EDV)、射血分数(EF)和每搏输出量(SV),并评估了相关系数、系统误差、一致性界限和观察者间变异性。在DSCT中,EDV和ESV分别为135.8±41.9毫升和54.9±29.6毫升,而MRI中的EDV为132.1±40.8毫升,ESV为57.6±27.3毫升。因此,EDV被高估了3.7毫升(一致性界限为-46.1/+53.6),而ESV被低估了2.6毫升(-36.6/+31.4)。DSCT的平均EF为61.6±12.4%,MRI为57.9±9.0%,导致EF被高估了3.8%,一致性界限为-14.7和+22.2%。EDV的等级相关rho值为0.81(P = 0.0024),ESV为0.79(P = 0.0031),EF为0.64(P = 0.0168)。EDV、ESV和EF的观察者间变异性kappa值为0.85。DSCT能够从冠状动脉CT血管造影数据集中定量评估左心室功能,具有足够的诊断准确性,增加了该检查方法在全面心脏评估中的价值。测量值中观察到的差异可能是由于不同的后处理方法以及在未使用β受体阻滞剂药物的情况下对造影剂注射的生理反应所致。