Soldan Anja, Zarahn Eric, Hilton H John, Stern Yaakov
Cognitive Neuroscience Division of the Taub Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):515-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
In this study, we tested the prediction of the component process model of priming [Henson, R.N. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog Neurobiol, 70 (1), 53-81] that repetition priming of familiar and unfamiliar objects produces qualitatively different neural repetition effects. In an fMRI study, subjects viewed four repetitions of familiar objects and globally unfamiliar objects with familiar components. Reliable behavioral priming occurred for both item types across the four presentations and was of a similar magnitude for both stimulus types. The imaging data were analyzed using multivariate linear modeling, which permits explicit testing of the hypothesis that the repetition effects for familiar and unfamiliar objects are qualitatively different (i.e., non-scaled versions of one another). The results showed the presence of two qualitatively different latent spatial patterns of repetition effects from presentation 1 to presentation 4 for familiar and unfamiliar objects, indicating that familiarity with an object's global structural, semantic, or lexical features is an important factor in priming-related neural plasticity. The first latent spatial pattern strongly weighted regions with a similar repetition effect for both item types. The second pattern strongly weighted regions contributing a repetition suppression effect for the familiar objects and repetition enhancement for the unfamiliar objects, particularly the posterior insula, superior temporal gyrus, precentral gyrus, and cingulate cortex. This differential repetition effect might reflect the formation of novel memory representations for the unfamiliar items, which already exist for the familiar objects, consistent with the component process model of priming.
在本研究中,我们检验了启动成分过程模型[亨森,R.N.(2003年)。启动的神经影像学研究。《神经生物学进展》,70(1),53 - 81]的预测,即熟悉和不熟悉物体的重复启动会产生质的不同的神经重复效应。在一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中,受试者观看了熟悉物体和具有熟悉组成部分但整体不熟悉物体的四次重复呈现。在四次呈现中,两种类型的项目都出现了可靠的行为启动,并且两种刺激类型的启动幅度相似。成像数据使用多变量线性模型进行分析,该模型允许对熟悉和不熟悉物体的重复效应在质上不同(即彼此的非缩放版本)这一假设进行明确检验。结果表明,从呈现1到呈现4,熟悉和不熟悉物体存在两种质的不同的潜在重复效应空间模式,这表明对物体整体结构、语义或词汇特征的熟悉程度是启动相关神经可塑性的一个重要因素。第一种潜在空间模式强烈加权了两种项目类型具有相似重复效应的区域。第二种模式强烈加权了对熟悉物体产生重复抑制效应、对不熟悉物体产生重复增强效应的区域,特别是后岛叶、颞上回、中央前回和扣带回皮质。这种差异重复效应可能反映了不熟悉项目形成了新的记忆表征,而熟悉物体已经存在这种表征,这与启动成分过程模型一致。