Saleh I M, Ruyter I E, Haapasalo M, Ørstavik D
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Int Endod J. 2008 Jan;41(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01304.x. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
To study the effect of the smear layer on the penetration of bacteria along different root canal filling materials and to examine the dentine/sealer and sealer/core material interfaces for the presence of bacteria.
A total of 110 human root segments were instrumented to size 80 under irrigation with 1% sodium hypochlorite. Half of the roots were irrigated with a 5-mL rinse of 17% EDTA. Roots with and without smear layer were filled with gutta-percha (GP) and AH Plus sealer (AH), GP and Apexit sealer (AP), or RealSeal cones and sealer (RS). Following storage in humid conditions at 37 degrees C for 7 days, the specimens were mounted into a bacterial leakage test model for 135 days. Survival analyses were performed to calculate the median time of leakage and log-rank test was used for pairwise comparisons of groups. The level of significance was set at P = 0.05. Selected specimens were longitudinally sectioned and inspected by scanning electron microscopy for the presence of bacteria at the interfaces.
In the presence of the smear layer, RS and AP leaked significantly more slowly than in its absence. In the absence of the smear layer, AH leaked significantly more slowly than RS. SEM results indicated a differential pattern of bacterial penetration among the sealers.
Removal of the smear layer did not impair bacterial penetration along root canal fillings. A comparison of the sealers revealed no difference except that AH performed better than RS in the absence of the smear layer.
研究玷污层对不同根管充填材料细菌侵入的影响,并检查牙本质/封闭剂和封闭剂/核心材料界面有无细菌存在。
总共110个离体人牙根在1%次氯酸钠冲洗下预备至80号。一半牙根用5 mL 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗。有和没有玷污层的牙根分别用牙胶尖(GP)和AH Plus封闭剂(AH)、GP和Apexit封闭剂(AP)或RealSeal牙胶尖和封闭剂(RS)充填。在37℃潮湿环境中储存7天后,将标本安装到细菌渗漏测试模型中135天。进行生存分析以计算渗漏的中位时间,并使用对数秩检验对各组进行两两比较。显著性水平设定为P = 0.05。选取的标本进行纵向切片,通过扫描电子显微镜检查界面处有无细菌。
在有玷污层的情况下,RS和AP的渗漏明显比没有玷污层时慢。在没有玷污层的情况下,AH的渗漏明显比RS慢。扫描电子显微镜结果表明封闭剂之间细菌侵入模式不同。
去除玷污层不会损害细菌沿根管充填物的侵入。对封闭剂的比较显示,除了在没有玷污层时AH比RS表现更好外,没有差异。