Milani Amin Salem, Kuzegari Sepideh, Zand Vahid, Mokhtari Hadi, Rahbar Mahdi
Endodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran.
Maedica (Bucur). 2021 Sep;16(3):458-462. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2021.16.3.458.
The lateral canals are pathways for bacteria and their products to pass between the root canal and the periradicular tissue. The present study aims to compare the filling ability of the lateral canals with three calcium silicate based sealers, including MTA Fillapex, Endoseal MTA and Sure-Seal Root, and AH26 epoxy resin sealer in the presence and absence of the smear layer. Six lateral canals were prepared using an engine reamer in 80 single-rooted human teeth. The root canals were cleaned, then the teeth were randomly divided into two groups. In group A, the smearlayer was removed using 17% EDTA and 5.25% NaOCl, and in group B, the canals were irrigated with normal saline. Groups A and B were divided into four subgroups each, according to the sealer used: A1, B1 (MTA Fillapex sealer), A2, B2 (Endoseal MTA sealer), A3, B3 (Sure-Seal Root sealer), and A4, B4 (AH26 sealer). Obturation of canals was conducted by the warm vertical technique and then teeth were incubated for 72 hours. Teeth were made clear and the filling of lateral canals were evaluated under stereomicroscope. In group A, the highest lateral canals filling rate was in subgroup A2 and the lowest in subgroup A1, and the difference was statistically significant. However, in both groups, the highest lateral canals filling rate was in subgroups B2 and B3 and the lowest in subgroup B1. However, the difference was not statistically significant. In addition, no significant difference was observed in the lateral canals filling rate considering their position in the root. Providing the removal of the smear layer, calcium silicate-based sealers, Endoseal MTA and Sure-Seal Root had a higher ability to fill the lateral canals than AH26 and MTA fillapex sealers.
侧支根管是细菌及其产物在根管与根尖周组织之间通行的通道。本研究旨在比较三种硅酸钙类封闭剂(包括MTA Fillapex、Endoseal MTA和Sure-Seal Root)与AH26环氧树脂封闭剂在有或无玷污层存在的情况下对侧支根管的充填能力。使用机用扩孔钻在80颗单根人牙中制备6条侧支根管。根管清理后,将牙齿随机分为两组。A组使用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)去除玷污层,B组用生理盐水冲洗根管。根据所用封闭剂的不同,A组和B组又各自分为四个亚组:A1、B1(MTA Fillapex封闭剂),A2、B2(Endoseal MTA封闭剂),A3、B3(Sure-Seal Root封闭剂),以及A4、B4(AH26封闭剂)。采用热垂直加压技术进行根管充填,然后将牙齿孵育72小时。牙齿经过透明处理后,在体视显微镜下评估侧支根管的充填情况。在A组中,侧支根管充填率最高的是A2亚组,最低的是A1亚组,差异具有统计学意义。然而,在两组中,侧支根管充填率最高的是B2和B3亚组,最低的是B1亚组。不过,差异无统计学意义。此外,考虑到侧支根管在牙根中的位置,其充填率未观察到显著差异。在去除玷污层的情况下,硅酸钙类封闭剂Endoseal MTA和Sure-Seal Root充填侧支根管的能力高于AH26和MTA Fillapex封闭剂。