Fontaine Reid Griffith
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Blvd., Tucson, AZ 85721, United States.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;28(1):17-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
The last quarter century has witnessed considerable progress in the scientific study of social information processing (SIP) and aggressive behavior in children. SIP research has shown that social decision making in youth is particularly predictive of antisocial behavior, especially as children enter and progress through adolescence. In furtherance of this research, more sophisticated, elaborate models of on-line social decision making have been developed, by which various domains of evaluative judgment are hypothesized to account for both responsive decision making and behavior, as well as self-initiated, instrumental functioning. However, discussions of these models have neglected a number of key issues. In particular, the roles of nonconscious cognitive factors, learning and development, impulsivity and behavioral disinhibition, emotion, and other internal and external factors (e.g., pharmacological influences and audience effects) have been largely absent from scholarly writings. In response, this article introduces discussion of these factors and reviews their possible roles in on-line social decision making and antisocial behavior in youth.
在过去的二十五年里,儿童社会信息处理(SIP)与攻击性行为的科学研究取得了显著进展。SIP研究表明,青少年的社会决策对反社会行为具有特别的预测作用,尤其是在儿童进入青春期并在这一阶段成长的过程中。为推动这项研究,人们开发出了更为复杂、精细的在线社会决策模型,据此假设各种评估判断领域既能解释反应性决策与行为,也能解释自我发起的工具性机能。然而,对这些模型的讨论忽略了一些关键问题。特别是,潜意识认知因素、学习与发展、冲动性与行为抑制、情感以及其他内部和外部因素(如药理影响和观众效应)在学术著作中基本未被提及。作为回应,本文引入了对这些因素的讨论,并审视它们在青少年在线社会决策和反社会行为中可能发挥的作用。