Fite Jennifer E, Goodnight Jackson A, Bates John E, Dodge Kenneth A, Pettit Gregory S
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47403, USA.
Aggress Behav. 2008 Sep-Oct;34(5):511-20. doi: 10.1002/ab.20263.
This study asked how individual differences in social cognition and personality interact in predicting later aggressive behavior. It was hypothesized that the relationship between immediate response evaluations in social information processing (SIP) and later aggressive behavior would be moderated by impulsivity. In particular, the immediate positive evaluations of aggressive responses would be more strongly related to later aggressive behavior for high-impulsive than for low-impulsive individuals, because high-impulsive children would be less likely to integrate peripheral information and consider long-term future consequences of their actions. Participants were 585 adolescents (52% male) and their mothers and teachers from the longitudinal Child Development Project. Structural equation modeling indicated that teacher-reported impulsivity at ages 11-13 moderated the association between adolescents' endorsement of aggressive responses in hypothetical, ambiguous situations and subsequent mother-reported aggressive behavior. Specifically, positive endorsement of aggressive responses at age 13 was significantly related to later aggressive behavior (age 14-17) for participants with high and medium levels of impulsivity, but this association was not significant for participants with low levels of impulsivity. This study provides evidence of personality variables as potential moderators of the link between SIP and behavior.
本研究探讨了社会认知和人格方面的个体差异如何相互作用以预测后期的攻击性行为。研究假设,社会信息加工(SIP)中的即时反应评估与后期攻击性行为之间的关系将受到冲动性的调节。具体而言,对于高冲动性个体,对攻击反应的即时积极评估与后期攻击性行为的关联要强于低冲动性个体,因为高冲动性儿童不太可能整合周边信息并考虑其行为的长期后果。参与者为来自纵向儿童发展项目的585名青少年(52%为男性)及其母亲和教师。结构方程模型表明,11至13岁时教师报告的冲动性调节了青少年在假设的模糊情境中对攻击反应的认可与随后母亲报告的攻击性行为之间的关联。具体而言,对于高冲动性和中等冲动性水平的参与者,13岁时对攻击反应的积极认可与后期攻击性行为(14至17岁)显著相关,但对于低冲动性水平的参与者,这种关联并不显著。本研究提供了证据,证明人格变量可能是SIP与行为之间联系的调节因素。