Suppr超能文献

大鼠在一个和两个延迟强化物之间的选择。

Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.

作者信息

Mazur James E

机构信息

Psychology Department, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, Connecticut 06515, USA.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2007 Aug;35(3):169-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03193052.

Abstract

Rats chose between alternatives that differed in the number of reinforcers and in the delay to each reinforcer. A left leverpress led to two reinforcers, each delivered after a fixed delay. A right leverpress led to one reinforcer after an adjusting delay. The adjusting delay was increased or decreased many times in a session, depending on the rat's choices, in order to estimate an indifference point--a delay at which the two alternatives were chosen about equally often. Both the number of reinforcers and their individual delays affected the indifference points. The overall pattern of results was well described by the hyperbolic-decay model, which states that each additional reinforcer delivered by an alternative increases preference for that alternative but that a reinforcer's effect is inversely related to its delay. Two other possible delay-discounting equations, an exponential equation and a reciprocal equation, did not produce satisfactory predictions for these data. Adding an additional free parameter to the hyperbolic equation as an exponent for delay did not appreciably improve the predictions, suggesting that raising delay to some power other than 1.0 was unnecessary. The results were qualitatively similar to those from a previous experiment with pigeons, but quantitative differences suggested that the rates of delay discounting were several times slower for rats than for pigeons.

摘要

大鼠在不同强化物数量以及每个强化物延迟时间不同的选项之间进行选择。按压左侧杠杆会产生两个强化物,每个强化物在固定延迟后给予。按压右侧杠杆在调整延迟后会产生一个强化物。在一次实验过程中,调整延迟会根据大鼠的选择多次增加或减少,以估计无差异点——即两个选项被选择的频率大致相等时的延迟时间。强化物的数量及其各自的延迟时间都会影响无差异点。结果的总体模式可以用双曲线衰减模型很好地描述,该模型指出,一个选项提供的每一个额外强化物都会增加对该选项的偏好,但强化物的效果与其延迟时间成反比。另外两个可能的延迟折扣方程,指数方程和倒数方程,对这些数据没有产生令人满意的预测。在双曲线方程中增加一个额外的自由参数作为延迟的指数并没有明显改善预测效果,这表明将延迟提升到1.0以外的某个幂次是不必要的。结果在定性上与之前对鸽子进行的实验相似,但定量差异表明,大鼠的延迟折扣率比鸽子慢几倍。

相似文献

1
Rats' choices between one and two delayed reinforcers.
Learn Behav. 2007 Aug;35(3):169-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03193052.
2
Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Mar;91(2):197-211. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-197.
3
Effects of time between trials on rats' and pigeons' choices with probabilistic delayed reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):41-56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-41.
4
Choice between single and multiple delayed reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jul;46(1):67-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-67.
5
Transitional and steady-state choice behavior under an adjusting-delay schedule.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Jan;95(1):57-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-57.
6
Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jan;55(1):63-77. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-63.
8
Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):353-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-353.
9
Effects of intertrial reinforcers on self-control choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):83-96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-83.
10
Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):175-87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-175.

引用本文的文献

1
The orbitofrontal cortex in temporal cognition.
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr;135(2):154-164. doi: 10.1037/bne0000430.
2
The relationship between dietary fat intake, impulsive choice, and metabolic health.
Appetite. 2021 Oct 1;165:105292. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105292. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Dissecting drug effects in preclinical models of impulsive choice: emphasis on glutamatergic compounds.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Mar;235(3):607-626. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4825-0. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
4
Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.
Learn Behav. 2018 Mar;46(1):38-48. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0279-9.
5
Mechanisms of Individual Differences in Impulsive and Risky Choice in Rats.
Comp Cogn Behav Rev. 2015;10:45-72. doi: 10.3819/ccbr.2015.100003.
7
Delay discounting: Pigeon, rat, human--does it matter?
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):141-62. doi: 10.1037/xan0000097. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
8
Measurement of impulsive choice in rats: same- and alternate-form test-retest reliability and temporal tracking.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):166-79. doi: 10.1002/jeab.124. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
9
Adaptive intertemporal preferences in foraging-style environments.
Front Neurosci. 2013 Jun 17;7:93. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00093. eCollection 2013.
10
Effect of orbitofrontal cortex lesions on temporal discounting in rats.
Behav Brain Res. 2013 May 15;245:22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.02.014. Epub 2013 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-month stability of delay and probability discounting measures.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;14(3):318-28. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.3.318.
2
Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Nov;64(3):263-76. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-263.
3
Choice and multiple reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):115-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-115.
4
Choice and number of reinforcers.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Jul;32(1):51-63. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-51.
5
A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jan;15(1):27-38. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-27.
6
Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):73-86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-73.
7
Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):247-52. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-247.
8
Notes on discounting.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 May;85(3):425-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.85-05.
9
Tradeoffs among delay, rate, and amount of reinforcement.
Behav Processes. 2000 Mar 31;49(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00070-x.
10
Determination of discount functions in rats with an adjusting-amount procedure.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1997 May;67(3):353-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-353.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验