Suppr超能文献

大鼠冲动性选择的测量:同型和异型重测信度及时间追踪

Measurement of impulsive choice in rats: same- and alternate-form test-retest reliability and temporal tracking.

作者信息

Peterson Jennifer R, Hill Catherine C, Kirkpatrick Kimberly

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University.

出版信息

J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Jan;103(1):166-79. doi: 10.1002/jeab.124. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

Abstract

Impulsive choice is typically measured by presenting smaller-sooner (SS) versus larger-later (LL) rewards, with biases towards the SS indicating impulsivity. The current study tested rats on different impulsive choice procedures with LL delay manipulations to assess same-form and alternate-form test-retest reliability. In the systematic-GE procedure (Green & Estle, 2003), the LL delay increased after several sessions of training; in the systematic-ER procedure (Evenden & Ryan, 1996), the delay increased within each session; and in the adjusting-M procedure (Mazur, 1987), the delay changed after each block of trials within a session based on each rat's choices in the previous block. In addition to measuring choice behavior, we also assessed temporal tracking of the LL delays using the median times of responding during LL trials. The two systematic procedures yielded similar results in both choice and temporal tracking measures following extensive training, whereas the adjusting procedure resulted in relatively more impulsive choices and poorer temporal tracking. Overall, the three procedures produced acceptable same form test-retest reliability over time, but the adjusting procedure did not show significant alternate form test-retest reliability with the other two procedures. The results suggest that systematic procedures may supply better measurements of impulsive choice in rats.

摘要

冲动选择通常通过呈现较小即时(SS)与较大延迟(LL)奖励来衡量,对SS的偏好表明冲动性。当前研究在不同的冲动选择程序中对大鼠进行测试,通过操纵LL延迟来评估同形式和交替形式的重测信度。在系统-GE程序(Green & Estle,2003)中,经过几次训练后LL延迟增加;在系统-ER程序(Evenden & Ryan,1996)中,延迟在每次训练中增加;在调整-M程序(Mazur,1987)中,根据每只大鼠在前一个试验块中的选择,延迟在每次试验块后发生变化。除了测量选择行为外,我们还使用LL试验期间反应的中位数时间来评估对LL延迟的时间跟踪。经过广泛训练后,两种系统程序在选择和时间跟踪测量方面产生了相似的结果,而调整程序导致相对更多的冲动选择和较差的时间跟踪。总体而言,随着时间的推移,这三种程序产生了可接受的同形式重测信度,但调整程序与其他两种程序相比,未显示出显著的交替形式重测信度。结果表明,系统程序可能为大鼠的冲动选择提供更好的测量方法。

相似文献

2
Effects of different fixed-ratio requirements on delay discounting in rats.不同固定比率要求对大鼠延迟折扣的影响。
Behav Processes. 2013 Nov;100:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

2
9
Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.不同结果的延迟折扣:综述与理论。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 May;113(3):657-679. doi: 10.1002/jeab.589. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
10
Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.促进自我控制的认知和行为训练干预措施。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):259-279. doi: 10.1037/xan0000208. Epub 2019 May 9.

本文引用的文献

3
Isolating the delay component of impulsive choice in adolescent rats.分离青少年大鼠冲动选择的延迟成分。
Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 Jan 27;8:3. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00003. eCollection 2014.
5
A concurrent-choice analysis of amount-dependent temporal discounting.基于数量依赖的时间折扣的并发选择分析。
Behav Processes. 2013 Jul;97:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.007. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验