Li Wen, Zinbarg Richard E, Boehm Stephan G, Paller Ken A
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jan;20(1):95-107. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20006.
Abstract Affective judgments can often be influenced by emotional information people unconsciously perceive, but the neural mechanisms responsible for these effects and how they are modulated by individual differences in sensitivity to threat are unclear. Here we studied subliminal affective priming by recording brain potentials to surprise faces preceded by 30-msec happy or fearful prime faces. Participants showed valence-consistent changes in affective ratings of surprise faces, although they reported no knowledge of prime-face expressions, nor could they discriminate between prime-face expressions in a forced-choice test. In conjunction with the priming effect on affective evaluation, larger occipital P1 potentials at 145-175 msec were found with fearful than with happy primes, and source analyses implicated the bilateral extrastriate cortex in this effect. Later brain potentials at 300-400 msec were enhanced with happy versus fearful primes, which may reflect differential attentional orienting. Personality testing for sensitivity to threat, especially social threat, was also used to evaluate individual differences potentially relevant to subliminal affective priming. Indeed, participants with high trait anxiety demonstrated stronger affective priming and greater P1 differences than did those with low trait anxiety, and these effects were driven by fearful primes. Results thus suggest that unconsciously perceived affective information influences social judgments by altering very early perceptual analyses, and that this influence is accentuated to the extent that people are oversensitive to threat. In this way, perception may be subject to a variety of influences that govern social preferences in the absence of concomitant awareness of such influences.
情感判断常常会受到人们无意识感知到的情绪信息的影响,但负责这些效应的神经机制以及它们如何受到对威胁敏感度的个体差异的调节尚不清楚。在这里,我们通过记录对30毫秒的快乐或恐惧启动面孔之后出现的惊讶面孔的脑电活动来研究阈下情感启动。参与者在对惊讶面孔的情感评分上表现出效价一致的变化,尽管他们表示不知道启动面孔的表情,并且在迫选测试中也无法区分启动面孔的表情。与情感评价的启动效应相结合,发现与快乐启动相比,恐惧启动在145 - 175毫秒时枕叶的P1电位更大,源分析表明这种效应涉及双侧纹外皮层。在300 - 400毫秒时,快乐启动比恐惧启动引发的脑电活动增强,这可能反映了不同的注意定向。还通过对威胁,尤其是社会威胁敏感度的人格测试来评估与阈下情感启动潜在相关的个体差异。事实上,高特质焦虑的参与者比低特质焦虑的参与者表现出更强的情感启动和更大的P1差异,并且这些效应是由恐惧启动驱动的。因此,结果表明无意识感知到的情感信息通过改变非常早期的感知分析来影响社会判断,并且这种影响在人们对威胁过度敏感的程度上会加剧。通过这种方式,在没有意识到此类影响的情况下,感知可能会受到各种影响社会偏好的因素的作用。