Löwe Bernd, Hartmann Mechthild, Wild Beate, Nikendei Christoph, Kroenke Kurt, Niehoff Dorothea, Henningsen Peter, Zipfel Stephan, Herzog Wolfgang
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and Hamburg-Eilbek (Schön Clinics), Hamburg, Germany.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Feb;23(2):122-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0397-8. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
To increase the number of clinician scientists and to improve research skills, a number of clinical research training programs have been recently established. However, controlled studies assessing their effectiveness are lacking.
To investigate the effectiveness of a 1-year resident training program in clinical research.
Controlled before-and-after study. The training program included a weekly class in clinical research methods, completion of a research project, and mentorship.
Intervention subjects were 15 residents participating in the 1-year training program in clinical research. Control subjects were 22 residents not participating in the training program.
Assessments were performed at the beginning and end of the program. Outcomes included methodological research knowledge (multiple-choice progress test), self-assessed research competence, progress on publications and grant applications, and evaluation of the program using quantitative and qualitative methods.
Intervention subjects and controls were well matched with respect to research experience (5.1 +/- 2.2 vs 5.6 +/- 5.8 years; p = .69). Methodological knowledge improved significantly more in the intervention group compared to the control group (effect size = 2.5; p < .001). Similarly, self-assessed research competence increased significantly more in the intervention group (effect size = 1.1; p = .01). At the end of the program, significantly more intervention subjects compared to controls were currently writing journal articles (87% vs 36%; p = .003). The intervention subjects evaluated the training program as highly valuable for becoming independent researchers.
A 1-year training program in clinical research can substantially increase research knowledge and productivity. The program design makes it feasible to implement in other academic settings.
为增加临床科研人员数量并提高研究技能,近期已设立了多个临床研究培训项目。然而,缺乏评估其效果的对照研究。
调查一项为期1年的住院医师临床研究培训项目的效果。
前后对照研究。培训项目包括每周一次的临床研究方法课程、完成一个研究项目以及导师指导。
干预组为15名参加为期1年临床研究培训项目的住院医师。对照组为22名未参加培训项目的住院医师。
在项目开始和结束时进行评估。结果包括方法学研究知识(多项选择进展测试)、自我评估的研究能力、论文发表和基金申请进展,以及使用定量和定性方法对项目的评估。
干预组和对照组在研究经验方面匹配良好(5.1±2.2年对5.6±5.8年;p = 0.69)。与对照组相比,干预组的方法学知识改善更为显著(效应量 = 2.5;p < 0.001)。同样,干预组自我评估的研究能力提高也更为显著(效应量 = 1.1;p = 0.01)。在项目结束时,与对照组相比,正在撰写期刊文章的干预组受试者显著更多(87%对36%;p = 0.003)。干预组受试者认为该培训项目对于成为独立研究者非常有价值。
一项为期1年的临床研究培训项目可大幅增加研究知识和生产力。该项目设计使其在其他学术环境中得以实施。