Geraghty Estella M, Franks Peter, Kravitz Richard L
Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1641-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0371-5. Epub 2007 Oct 6.
The contribution of physician and organizational factors to visit length, quality, and satisfaction remains uncertain, in part, because of confounding by patient presentation.
To determine associations among visit length, quality, and satisfaction when patient presentation is controlled.
A factorial experiment using standardized patients to make primary care visits presenting with either major depression or adjustment disorder, and a musculoskeletal complaint.
One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians, each seeing 2 standardized patients.
Visit length was determined from surreptitiously obtained audiorecordings. Other key measures were derived from physician and standardized patient report.
Mean visit length for 294 completed encounters was 22.3 minutes (range = 5.8-72.2, SD = 9.4). Key factors associated with visit length were: physician style (rho = 0.68 and 0.54 after multivariate adjustment), nonprofessional experience with depression (11% longer, 95% CI = 0-23%), practicing within an HMO (26% shorter, 95% CI = 61-90%), and greater practice volume (those working >9 half-day clinic sessions/week had 15% shorter visits than those working fewer than 6, 95% CI = 0-27%, and those seeing >12 patients/half-day had 27% shorter visits than those seeing <10 patients/half-day, 95% CI = 13-39%). Suicidal inquiry (a process-based quality-of-care measure for depression) was not associated with adjusted visit length. Satisfaction was linearly associated with visit length but not with suicide inquiry or follow-up interval.
Despite experimental control for clinical presentation, wide variation in visit length persists, largely reflecting individual physician styles. Visit length is a significant determinant of standardized patient satisfaction.
医生因素和组织因素对就诊时长、质量及满意度的影响尚不确定,部分原因是患者表现存在混杂因素。
在控制患者表现的情况下,确定就诊时长、质量和满意度之间的关联。
一项析因实验,使用标准化患者进行初级保健就诊,表现为重度抑郁症或适应障碍以及肌肉骨骼疾病主诉。
152名初级保健医生,每人接待2名标准化患者。
就诊时长通过秘密获取的录音确定。其他关键指标来自医生和标准化患者的报告。
294次完整就诊的平均时长为22.3分钟(范围=5.8 - 72.2,标准差=9.4)。与就诊时长相关的关键因素包括:医生风格(多变量调整后rho = 0.68和0.54)、抑郁症非专业经历(长11%,95%置信区间=0 - 23%)、在健康维护组织(HMO)内执业(短26%,95%置信区间=61 - 90%)以及更大的工作量(每周工作超过9个半天门诊时段的医生就诊时长比工作少于6个半天门诊时段的医生短15%,95%置信区间=0 - 27%;半天看诊超过12名患者的医生就诊时长比看诊少于10名患者的医生短27%,95%置信区间=13 - 39%)。自杀询问(抑郁症基于过程的医疗质量指标)与调整后的就诊时长无关。满意度与就诊时长呈线性相关,但与自杀询问或随访间隔无关。
尽管对临床表现进行了实验控制,但就诊时长仍存在很大差异,主要反映了个体医生风格。就诊时长是标准化患者满意度的重要决定因素。