Nicosia Gisella, Gliatta Angela E, Woodbury M Gail, Houghton Pamela E
School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Int Wound J. 2007 Sep;4(3):197-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00333.x.
This meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of a pressure-relieving intervention on the incidence of heel pressure ulcers in a variety of settings. Literature searches of Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were conducted for English-language articles that investigated the effect of pressure relief interventions with or without concurrent prevention programs on the number of heel ulcers occurring on adult humans in a controlled clinical design. Full articles were selected from citations based upon consensus between at least two independent reviewers. Methodological quality of each study was assessed using the Jadad and PEDro scales. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine and compare relative risk (RR) between pressure relief programs/devices that were classified according to similarity of interventions. Fourteen studies that involved a total of 1457 subjects were selected from a total of 105 full articles reviewed. Pressure-reducing/relieving surfaces were associated with a significantly lower incidence of heel ulcers compared with standard hospital mattresses (RR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.26-0.93, P < 0.03). Foam mattresses also significantly reduced the risk of developing heel ulcers. There is evidence to support the use of certain air or foam mattresses/overlays in the prevention of heel pressure ulcers when compared with a standard hospital mattress. There is insufficient research available at this time to determine if heel-protective devices can prevent heel pressure ulcers. These results need to be interpreted with caution given the relatively low number and poor quality of research articles available to date.
这项荟萃分析调查了减压干预措施在各种环境下对足跟压疮发生率的有效性。对护理及相关健康文献累积索引、医学期刊数据库、医学期刊全文数据库、荷兰医学文摘数据库和考科蓝图书馆数据库进行文献检索,查找英文文章,这些文章在对照临床设计中研究了减压干预措施(无论是否同时采取预防方案)对成年人群足跟溃疡发生数量的影响。基于至少两名独立评审员之间的共识,从参考文献中选取全文。使用贾达德量表和PEDro量表评估每项研究的方法学质量。进行定量分析,以确定和比较根据干预措施相似性分类的减压方案/设备之间的相对风险(RR)。从总共105篇综述全文中选取了14项研究,共涉及1457名受试者。与标准医院床垫相比,减压表面与足跟溃疡发生率显著降低相关(RR = 0.50,95%置信区间 = 0.26 - 0.93,P < 0.03)。泡沫床垫也显著降低了发生足跟溃疡的风险。有证据支持与标准医院床垫相比,使用某些空气或泡沫床垫/衬垫预防足跟压疮。目前尚无足够研究确定足跟保护装置能否预防足跟压疮。鉴于目前可用研究文章数量相对较少且质量较差,这些结果需要谨慎解读。