Suppr超能文献

接受物理治疗的腰痛患者初始恐惧回避信念的预测效度:FABQ是否是识别恢复不佳风险患者的有用筛查工具?

Predictive validity of initial fear avoidance beliefs in patients with low back pain receiving physical therapy: is the FABQ a useful screening tool for identifying patients at risk for a poor recovery?

作者信息

Cleland Joshua A, Fritz Julie M, Brennan Gerard P

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Physical Therapy Program, Franklin Pierce College, 5 Chenell Drive, Concord, NH 03301, USA.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2008 Jan;17(1):70-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0511-y. Epub 2007 Oct 10.

Abstract

Several prospective studies examining patients receiving physical therapy support the predictive validity of FABQ subscale scores. This has lead to the proposition that the FABQ would be a useful screening tool, permitting early identification of patients at risk for a poor outcome with an opportunity to modify the treatment accordingly. However, the predictive validity of the FABQ within physical therapy practice has yet to be examined. Predictive validity was analyzed between the FABQ-PA, FABQ-W using both disability and pain as the dependent variables using Pearson correlation coefficients and stepwise hierarchical linear regression modeling controlling for baseline variables. Separate analyses were run for patients with private health insurance and those receiving workers' compensation. Further analysis of predictive validity was performed by dichotomizing the outcome of physical therapy. Patients were coded as having a poor outcome if they failed to achieve a minimum clinically important change in disability over the course of treatment. The accuracy of previously reported cut-off scales for both the FABQ-W and FABQ-PA were examined for both payor types. Results of the hierarchical linear regression analyses for patients with private insurance showed neither the FABQ-PA nor the FABQ-W score significantly improved the explained variance in change in pain or disability. For patients receiving workers' compensation, only the FABQ-W subscale score significantly contributed to the model after controlling for the other baseline variables for both changes in disability and pain. Only the FABQ-W subscale was predictive of poor outcome and this was only identified in the worker's compensation group. The results suggest that the work subscale of the FABQ might be an appropriate screening tool to identify patients with work-related LBP who are at risk for a poor outcome with routine physical therapy. Neither FABQ subscale was predictive of outcome for patients with private insurance, and the use of the FABQ, as a screening tool for patients with non-work-related LBP was not supported.

摘要

多项针对接受物理治疗患者的前瞻性研究支持了FABQ分量表得分的预测效度。这引发了一种观点,即FABQ将是一种有用的筛查工具,能够早期识别预后不良风险的患者,并有机会相应地调整治疗方案。然而,FABQ在物理治疗实践中的预测效度尚未得到检验。使用Pearson相关系数和逐步分层线性回归模型,以残疾和疼痛作为因变量,对FABQ-PA、FABQ-W之间的预测效度进行了分析,并对基线变量进行了控制。对拥有私人健康保险的患者和接受工伤赔偿的患者分别进行了分析。通过将物理治疗结果二分法对预测效度进行了进一步分析。如果患者在治疗过程中未能在残疾方面实现最小临床重要变化,则被编码为预后不良。针对两种付款类型,均检查了先前报告的FABQ-W和FABQ-PA截止量表的准确性。对拥有私人保险患者的分层线性回归分析结果显示,FABQ-PA和FABQ-W得分均未显著改善疼痛或残疾变化的解释方差。对于接受工伤赔偿的患者,在控制了残疾和疼痛变化的其他基线变量后,只有FABQ-W分量表得分对模型有显著贡献。只有FABQ-W分量表可预测预后不良,且这仅在工伤赔偿组中得到确认。结果表明,FABQ的工作分量表可能是一种合适的筛查工具,用于识别患有与工作相关的腰痛且接受常规物理治疗预后不良风险的患者。对于拥有私人保险的患者,两个FABQ分量表均不能预测预后,且不支持将FABQ用作非工作相关腰痛患者的筛查工具。

相似文献

5
Clinical course and impact of fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain: prospective cohort study of acute and chronic low back pain: II.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):1038-46. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214878.01709.0e.
6
Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ).
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Jan;19(1):26-32. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0471-5. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
10
A psychometric investigation of fear-avoidance model measures in patients with chronic low back pain.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;40(4):197-205. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3298.

引用本文的文献

9
Prediction of walking ability following posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.
Eur Spine J. 2021 Nov;30(11):3307-3318. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06938-6. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
10
Individuals with recurrent low back pain exhibit further altered frontal plane trunk control in remission than when in pain.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2021 Jul;87:105391. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105391. Epub 2021 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of outcome in patients with (sub)acute low back pain differ across treatment groups.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1699-705. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000224179.04964.aa.
2
Fear-avoidance beliefs about back pain in patients with subacute low back pain.
Pain. 2006 Oct;124(3):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.04.019. Epub 2006 Jun 5.
3
Fear: a factor to consider in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;36(5):264-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.0106.
5
Pain-related fear at the start of a new low back pain episode.
Eur J Pain. 2005 Dec;9(6):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.12.007. Epub 2005 Jan 20.
7
A longitudinal study on the predictive validity of the fear-avoidance model in low back pain.
Pain. 2005 Sep;117(1-2):162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.06.002.
10
External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
Lancet. 2005;365(9453):82-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17670-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验