Suppr超能文献

氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和阿托品合剂用于儿科肿瘤程序性镇静的疗效与安全性:口服与肌内注射途径的随机研究

Efficacy and safety of a mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine for procedural sedation in paediatric oncology: a randomised study of oral versus intramuscular route.

作者信息

Bhatnagar Sushma, Mishra Seema, Gupta Meenu, Srikanti Madhurima, Mondol Anindya, Diwedi Alok

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 Apr;44(4):201-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01233.x. Epub 2007 Oct 10.

Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine given orally by comparing the same mixture given through the intramuscular route in children with malignancy undergoing minor invasive procedures.

METHODS

Sixty children, aged between 1 and 10 years, scheduled to undergo minor procedures were randomised into two groups to receive a mixture of ketamine (6 mg/kg), midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and atropine (0.02 mg/kg) intramuscularly (Group 1) or ketamine (10 mg/kg), midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) and atropine (0.05 mg/kg) orally (Group 2). Sedation score, observer-rated visual analogue scale for pain were noted by an observer blinded to the route of drug administration.

RESULTS

Optimum sedation was present in all children in both groups after drug administration, with Group 1 being more deeply sedated than Group 2 at the start of the procedure. Supplementation with intravenous ketamine was required in four children in Group 1 and eight children in Group 2 (P = 0.33). The mean (+/-SD) observer-rated visual analogue scale for pain during the procedure was 8.33 (+/-15.99) and 9.33 (+/-16.39) in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively (P = 0.892). One patient in Group 1 had vomiting after the procedure. There were no differences in proportion of patients with hallucinations and nystagmus in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A mixture of ketamine, midazolam and atropine given orally provides sedation and analgesia similar to that produced by the same drugs given intramuscularly. It offers advantage over the intramuscular route as it is painless and can be given for minor paediatric oncology procedures with appropriate monitoring.

摘要

目的

通过比较口服与肌肉注射氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和阿托品的混合物对接受微创操作的恶性肿瘤患儿的疗效和安全性。

方法

60名年龄在1至10岁、计划接受小手术的儿童被随机分为两组,分别接受肌肉注射氯胺酮(6毫克/千克)、咪达唑仑(0.05毫克/千克)和阿托品(0.02毫克/千克)(第1组)或口服氯胺酮(10毫克/千克)、咪达唑仑(0.2毫克/千克)和阿托品(0.05毫克/千克)(第2组)。由对给药途径不知情的观察者记录镇静评分、观察者评定的疼痛视觉模拟量表评分。

结果

给药后两组所有儿童均达到最佳镇静效果,第1组在操作开始时的镇静程度比第2组更深。第1组有4名儿童和第2组有8名儿童需要补充静脉注射氯胺酮(P = 0.33)。第1组和第2组在操作过程中观察者评定的疼痛视觉模拟量表评分均值(±标准差)分别为8.33(±15.99)和9.33(±16.39)(P = 0.892)。第1组有1名患者术后出现呕吐。两组幻觉和眼球震颤患者的比例无差异。

结论

口服氯胺酮、咪达唑仑和阿托品的混合物产生的镇静和镇痛效果与肌肉注射相同药物相似。它比肌肉注射途径更具优势,因为它无痛,并且在适当监测下可用于小儿肿瘤小手术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验