• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-舒芬太尼联合用药在血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿疼痛性操作中的镇痛和镇静效果比较

Comparison of the Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Midazolam-Ketamine and Propofol-Sufentanil Combinations in Painful Procedures of Children with Haematologic Malignancy.

作者信息

Aghadavoudi Omid, Shetabi Hamidreza, Dezfouli Zahra Saedi

机构信息

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Apr;48(2):120-126. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.42402. Epub 2019 Oct 8.

DOI:10.5152/TJAR.2019.42402
PMID:32259143
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7101195/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture play essential roles in the diagnosis and treatment of haematological disorders. These repeated invasive procedures lead to considerable pain and stress in children, which is emotionally stressful for their parents. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and outcomes of two combinations of midazolam-ketamine (MK) and propofol-sufentanil (PS) in painful procedures of children with haematologic malignancy.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial, we enrolled 80 eligible patients with haematologic malignancy aged 2-14 years. We randomly allocated them to the MK and PS groups. We recorded and compared the level of sedation, pain severity, hemodynamic indices, the onset of effect, duration of recovery and complications during and after procedure in the two groups. We analysed the data using the SPSS software. We used Mann-Whitney U, independent t-test, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to compare continuous and categorical variables.

RESULTS

From initially enrolled patients, 68 patients completed the study (38 in PS and 30 in MK group). The levels of sedation and the mean score of pain intensity were significantly lower in the MK group than those in the PS group (p<0.05). Movements and the needs to repeat the dose were significantly lower in the MK group than those in the PS group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

During bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture procedures in children with haematologic malignancy, the findings of this trial suggest that MK combination therapy provides better sedation and analgesia than PS.

摘要

目的

骨髓穿刺和腰椎穿刺在血液系统疾病的诊断和治疗中发挥着重要作用。这些反复的侵入性操作会给儿童带来相当大的疼痛和压力,也会让他们的父母在情感上感到紧张。本研究旨在比较咪达唑仑-氯胺酮(MK)和丙泊酚-舒芬太尼(PS)两种组合在血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿痛苦操作中的有效性和结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性、随机、双盲临床试验中,我们纳入了80名年龄在2至14岁的符合条件的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者。我们将他们随机分配到MK组和PS组。我们记录并比较了两组在操作过程中和操作后镇静水平、疼痛严重程度、血流动力学指标、起效时间、恢复时间和并发症情况。我们使用SPSS软件分析数据。我们使用曼-惠特尼U检验、独立t检验、卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验来比较连续变量和分类变量。

结果

从最初纳入的患者中,68名患者完成了研究(PS组38名,MK组30名)。MK组的镇静水平和疼痛强度平均评分显著低于PS组(p<0.05)。MK组的活动和重复给药需求显著低于PS组(p<0.05)。

结论

在血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿的骨髓穿刺和腰椎穿刺操作中,本试验结果表明MK联合治疗比PS提供更好的镇静和镇痛效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1272/7101195/455ca52573bd/TARD-48-2-120-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1272/7101195/455ca52573bd/TARD-48-2-120-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1272/7101195/455ca52573bd/TARD-48-2-120-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Analgesic and Sedative Effects of Midazolam-Ketamine and Propofol-Sufentanil Combinations in Painful Procedures of Children with Haematologic Malignancy.咪达唑仑-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-舒芬太尼联合用药在血液系统恶性肿瘤患儿疼痛性操作中的镇痛和镇静效果比较
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2020 Apr;48(2):120-126. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.42402. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
2
A comparison of ketamine + midazolam to propofol for procedural sedation for lumbar puncture in pediatric oncology by nonanesthesiologists-a randomized comparative trial.非麻醉医师行小儿肿瘤科腰椎穿刺术时,氯胺酮+咪达唑仑与异丙酚用于镇静的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Aug;65(8):e27108. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27108. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Procedural sedation with propofol for painful orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department expedites patient management compared with a midazolam/ketamine regimen: a randomized prospective study.在急诊科,与咪达唑仑/氯胺酮方案相比,异丙酚进行程序性镇静用于治疗骨科操作引起的疼痛可加快患者管理:一项随机前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2255-62. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01307.
4
Safety of sedation with ketamine in severe head injury patients: comparison with sufentanil.氯胺酮用于重度颅脑损伤患者镇静的安全性:与舒芬太尼的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):711-7. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000044505.24727.16.
5
Comparison Effect of Midazolam Alone and Midazolam Combined with Ketamine in Bone Marrow Aspiration Pain in Children.咪达唑仑单用与咪达唑仑联合氯胺酮用于小儿骨髓穿刺疼痛的比较效果
Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2015;5(3):131-7. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
6
A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial.儿童内镜检查期间咪达唑仑-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-芬太尼镇静效果的比较:一项随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;29(1):112-118. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000751.
7
Ketamine-midazolam versus meperidine-midazolam for painful procedures in pediatric oncology patients.氯胺酮-咪达唑仑与哌替啶-咪达唑仑用于儿科肿瘤患者疼痛性操作的比较。
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jan;15(1):94-102. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.94.
8
Immobilization of captive Persian fallow deer (Dama dama mesopotamica) using medetomidine-ketamine or medetomidine-midazolam.使用美托咪定-氯胺酮或美托咪定-咪达唑仑对圈养波斯黇鹿(Dama dama mesopotamica)进行保定。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2019 Sep;46(5):662-666. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
9
Assessment of perianesthesic data in subjects undergoing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration.接受支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术的受试者围麻醉期数据评估。
Respir Care. 2015 Apr;60(4):567-76. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03547. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
10
Ketamine/propofol versus midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial.氯胺酮/异丙酚与咪达唑仑/芬太尼在急诊科镇静和镇痛中的应用:一项随机、前瞻性、双盲试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):800-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01133.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Narrative Review of Pain in Pediatric Oncology: The Opioid Option for Procedural and Surgical Pain.儿科肿瘤学疼痛的叙述性综述:程序性和手术疼痛的阿片类药物选择
Paediatr Drugs. 2025 Jan;27(1):19-39. doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00654-6. Epub 2024 Sep 28.
2
The Effect of Preprocedural Low-Dose Ketamine for Pain and Anxiety in Patients during Thoracic Epidural Catheterization.术前低剂量氯胺酮对胸段硬膜外导管置入患者疼痛和焦虑的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Apr 22;60(4):679. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040679.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of combined propofol and sufentanil anesthesia in endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal varices.丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼麻醉在食管胃底静脉曲张内镜下注射硬化治疗中的作用。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 28;23(44):7875-7880. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7875.
2
A comparison of sedation with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial.儿童内镜检查期间咪达唑仑-氯胺酮与丙泊酚-芬太尼镇静效果的比较:一项随机试验
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jan;29(1):112-118. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000751.
3
Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients Before, During, and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: Update 2016.
儿科患者镇静诊断和治疗程序前、中、后监测和管理指南:2016 年更新。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1212.
4
Comparing the pain of propofol via different combinations of fentanyl, sufentanil or remifentanil in gastrointestinal endoscopy.比较芬太尼、舒芬太尼或瑞芬太尼不同组合用于胃肠内镜检查时丙泊酚的镇痛效果。
Acta Cir Bras. 2014 Oct;29(10):675-80. doi: 10.1590/s0102-8650201400160008.
5
Effect of two Different Concentrations of Propofol and Ketamine Combinations (Ketofol) in Pediatric Patients under Lumbar Puncture or Bone Marrow Aspiration.两种不同浓度的丙泊酚与氯胺酮组合(氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂)在小儿腰椎穿刺或骨髓穿刺术中的效果。
Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol. 2013;3(1):187-92. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
6
Sedation for short hemato-oncologic invasive procedures in children: comparison of propofol-remifentanil and propofol-fentanyl.儿童血液肿瘤短期侵入性操作的镇静:丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚-芬太尼的比较
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013 Mar;35(2):112-7. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318279cbda.
7
Comparison of propofol-remifentanil versus propofol-ketamine deep sedation for third molar surgery.丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼与丙泊酚-氯胺酮深度镇静用于第三磨牙手术的比较。
Anesth Prog. 2012 Fall;59(3):107-17. doi: 10.2344/12-00001.1.
8
Comparison of ketamine-low-dose midozolam with midazolam-fentanyl for orthopedic emergencies: a double-blind randomized trial.氯胺酮-小剂量咪达唑仑与咪达唑仑-芬太尼用于骨科急症的比较:一项双盲随机试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;31(1):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.06.012. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
9
Intravenous infusion of ketamine-propofol can be an alternative to intravenous infusion of fentanyl-propofol for deep sedation and analgesia in paediatric patients undergoing emergency short surgical procedures.对于接受急诊短时间外科手术的儿科患者,静脉输注氯胺酮-丙泊酚可作为静脉输注芬太尼-丙泊酚用于深度镇静和镇痛的替代方法。
Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;56(2):145-50. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.96313.
10
Intravenous ketamine is as effective as midazolam/fentanyl for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department.在急诊科,静脉注射氯胺酮在用于程序性镇静和镇痛时与咪达唑仑/芬太尼效果相当。
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Aug;66(3):231-3.