Leiblich Aaron, Cross Simon S, Catto James W F, Pesce Giancarlo, Hamdy Freddie C, Rehman Ishtiaq
Section of Oncology, Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Prostate. 2007 Dec 1;67(16):1761-9. doi: 10.1002/pros.20654.
A proportion of men with prostate cancer will progress to develop metastatic disease involving the lymph-nodes and bone. To identify novel candidates associated with metastatic progression, we compared the proteomic profiles of LNCaP (lymph-node metastatic, androgen-dependant) and PC-3 (bone metastatic, androgen-independent), human prostate cancer cells.
Two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE), followed by electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS), was used to identify differentially expressed proteins. Western blotting was used to validate the identity of any candidates. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess tissue expression.
2D-PAGE followed by ESI-MS/MS analyses identified the expression of glutathione S-transferase-pi (GST-pi) and protein gene product 9.5 (PGP 9.5) in PC-3 cells, but absent expression in LNCaP cells. PGP 9.5 expression in PC-3 cells was confirmed by Western blotting, in addition to expression in DU145 cells. Analysis of cell conditioned media showed that PGP 9.5 was secreted. Sequencing of the PGP 9.5 gene promoter region in bisulfite modified DNA, suggested that the regulation of expression involves promoter hypermethylation. RT-PCR analysis for Chromogranin A (ChA) mRNA (a marker of neuroendocrine cells), showed expression in PC-3 and DU145 cells but was undetectable in LNCaP cells. Immunohistochemistry localised PGP 9.5 expression exclusively within neuroendocrine cells and nerve fibres.
Our unexpected finding that the neuroendocrine cell markers PGP 9.5 and ChA are expressed by PC-3 and DU145 cells, suggests that these cells may have been derived from metastatic adenocarcinomas which had undergone neuroendocrine differentiation or alternatively the expression occurred ectopically as a result of cell culture.
一部分前列腺癌男性患者会进展为发生淋巴结和骨转移的疾病。为了鉴定与转移进展相关的新候选物,我们比较了人前列腺癌细胞LNCaP(淋巴结转移,雄激素依赖型)和PC-3(骨转移,雄激素非依赖型)的蛋白质组图谱。
采用二维聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(2D-PAGE),随后进行电喷雾电离串联质谱分析(ESI-MS/MS)来鉴定差异表达的蛋白质。蛋白质免疫印迹法用于验证任何候选物的身份。免疫组织化学用于评估组织表达情况。
2D-PAGE随后的ESI-MS/MS分析鉴定出谷胱甘肽S-转移酶-π(GST-π)和蛋白基因产物9.5(PGP 9.5)在PC-3细胞中有表达,但在LNCaP细胞中无表达。蛋白质免疫印迹法证实了PC-3细胞中PGP 9.5的表达,DU145细胞中也有表达。对细胞条件培养基的分析表明PGP 9.5是分泌型的。对经亚硫酸氢盐修饰的DNA中PGP 9.5基因启动子区域进行测序,提示表达的调控涉及启动子高甲基化。嗜铬粒蛋白A(ChA)mRNA(神经内分泌细胞的标志物)的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)分析显示,PC-3和DU145细胞中有表达,但在LNCaP细胞中未检测到。免疫组织化学将PGP 9.5的表达定位在神经内分泌细胞和神经纤维内。
我们意外地发现神经内分泌细胞标志物PGP 9.5和ChA在PC-3和DU145细胞中表达,这表明这些细胞可能来源于已发生神经内分泌分化的转移性腺癌,或者这种表达是细胞培养导致的异位表达。