Murray C A, Boyd P T, Young B C, Dhar S, Dickson M, Currie J N W
Adult Dental Care, University of Glasgow Dental School and Hospital, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ.
Br Dent J. 2007 Dec 8;203(11):E24; discussion 652-3. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.944. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
To assess the attitudes of healthcare workers within the UK towards identification marking of removable prostheses, and quantify the frequency with which this is currently undertaken.
A postal questionnaire-based study.
The study was undertaken within the UK between 2002 and 2006 and surveyed prosthodontists working in a wide range of clinical settings.
Questionnaires were sent to two sample groups: 1. Specialists in prosthodontics registered on the GDC specialist list; 2. Nursing staff in elderly care homes within the locality of Glasgow.
Return rate of questionnaires from prosthodontic specialists was high, with 119 from 160 (74%) completed and returned. 54.9% of prosthodontic specialists carried out complete denture marking in their clinical practice and 40.9% undertook identification marking of partial removable prostheses. The vast majority (81.0%) of specialists indicated that denture identification marking was a worthwhile procedure. Furthermore, 68.9% thought the introduction of some form of guideline would be beneficial. Differences in the frequency of denture marking existed between varying clinical environments. Denture marking was not undertaken by healthcare workers within any of the surveyed care homes.
The overwhelming opinion of prosthodontic specialists within the UK promotes the use of denture marking as a routine procedure.
评估英国医护人员对可摘义齿识别标记的态度,并量化目前进行该操作的频率。
一项基于邮寄问卷的研究。
该研究于2002年至2006年在英国开展,调查了在广泛临床环境中工作的口腔修复医生。
问卷被发送至两个样本组:1. 在英国牙科理事会专家名单上注册的口腔修复专科医生;2. 格拉斯哥当地养老院的护理人员。
口腔修复专科医生问卷的回复率很高,160份问卷中有119份(74%)填写并返回。54.9%的口腔修复专科医生在临床实践中对全口义齿进行标记,40.9%对可摘局部义齿进行识别标记。绝大多数(81.0%)的专科医生表示义齿识别标记是一项值得进行的操作。此外,68.9%的人认为引入某种形式的指南会有所帮助。不同临床环境中义齿标记的频率存在差异。在所调查的任何一家养老院中,医护人员均未进行义齿标记。
英国口腔修复专科医生的绝大多数意见支持将义齿标记作为常规操作。