Oh Sung Yong, Kwon Hyuk-Chan, Kim Won Seog, Park Yeon Hee, Kim Kihyun, Kim Hyun Jung, Kwon Jung Mi, Lee Jeeyun, Ko Young Hye, Ahn Yong Chan, Oh Suk Joong, Lee Soon Il, Bang Soo Mee, Kim Jung Han, Park Jinny, Ryoo Baek-Yeol, Lee Seung-Sook, Kim Ho Young, Park Keunchil, Kim Hyo-Jin
Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, 3-1 Dongdaeshin-Dong, Seo-Gu, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Cancer Lett. 2007 Dec 8;258(1):90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.08.012.
The International Prognostic Index (IPI) and Follicular Lymphoma Prognostic Index (FLIPI) are used as prognostic indices for NHL and indolent lymphoma. However, marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (MZL) evidences a distinctive clinical presentation and a natural course; thus, in this study, we attempted to devise an adequate prognostic index for MZL. Two-hundred and five patients diagnosed with MZL were retrospectively reviewed. After analysis of the prognostic factors, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), we constructed a prognostic index of MZL (MZLPI) via the summation of each factor. We then compared PFS and OS with IPI, FLIPI, and MZLPI. According to our multivariate analysis, nodal MZL, ECOG performance > or = 2, and advanced stage were composed of MZLPI. MZLPI was grouped as follows: score 0 as a low-risk group, score 1 as an intermediate risk group, and score 2 as a high-risk group. The PFS curve, according to MZLPI results, evidenced a more discriminated pattern than IPI and FLIPI, and this was especially true in the intermediate risk group. In OS, MZLPI (P=0.0007) evidenced a more discriminated pattern than IPI (P=NS) or FLIPI (P=0.0044). MZLPI, which is constructed of relatively simple factors, may represent a useful prognostic index for the prediction of PFS and OS in MZL, and may also be used as a substitute for IPI or FLIPI.
国际预后指数(IPI)和滤泡性淋巴瘤预后指数(FLIPI)被用作非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)和惰性淋巴瘤的预后指标。然而,边缘区B细胞淋巴瘤(MZL)具有独特的临床表现和自然病程;因此,在本研究中,我们试图设计一个适用于MZL的预后指数。对205例诊断为MZL的患者进行了回顾性研究。在分析预后因素、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)后,我们通过对各因素求和构建了MZL的预后指数(MZLPI)。然后我们将PFS和OS与IPI、FLIPI和MZLPI进行比较。根据我们的多因素分析,淋巴结MZL、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态≥2以及晚期构成了MZLPI。MZLPI分组如下:评分为0为低风险组,评分为1为中风险组,评分为2为高风险组。根据MZLPI结果绘制的PFS曲线显示出比IPI和FLIPI更具区分性的模式,在中风险组中尤其如此。在OS方面,MZLPI(P = 0.0007)显示出比IPI(P = 无显著性差异)或FLIPI(P = 0.0044)更具区分性的模式。由相对简单的因素构成的MZLPI可能是预测MZL的PFS和OS的有用预后指标,也可作为IPI或FLIPI 的替代指标。