Gakiopoulou H, Korkolopoulou P, Levidou G, Thymara I, Saetta A, Piperi C, Givalos N, Vassilopoulos I, Ventouri K, Tsenga A, Bamias A, Dimopoulos M-A, Agapitos E, Patsouris E
First Department of Pathology, Athens University, School of Medicine, GR-11527 Athens, Greece.
Br J Cancer. 2007 Oct 22;97(8):1124-34. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603992. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
Minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM) have recently emerged as novel proliferation markers with prognostic implications in several tumour types. This is the first study investigating MCM-2 and MCM-5 immunohistochemical expression in a series of ovarian adenocarcinomas and low malignant potential (LMP) tumours aiming to determine possible associations with clinicopathological parameters, the conventional proliferation index Ki-67, cell cycle regulators (p53, p27(Kip1), p21(WAF1) and pRb) and patients' outcome. Immunohistochemistry was applied in a series of 43 cases of ovarian LMP tumours and 85 cases of adenocarcinomas. Survival analysis was restricted to adenocarcinomas. The median MCM-2 and MCM-5 labelling indices (LIs) were significantly higher in adenocarcinomas compared to LMP tumours (P<0.0001 for both associations). In adenocarcinomas, the levels of MCM-2 and MCM-5 increased significantly with advancing tumour stage (P=0.0052 and P=0.0180, respectively), whereas both MCM-2 and MCM-5 increased significantly with increasing tumour grade (P=0.0002 and P=0.0006, respectively) and the presence of bulky residual disease (P<0.0001 in both relationships). A strong positive correlation was established between MCM-2 or MCM-5 expression level and Ki-67 LI (P<0.0001) as well as p53 protein (P=0.0038 and P=0.0500, respectively). Moreover, MCM-2 LI was inversely correlated with p27(Kip-1) LI (P=0.0068). Finally, both MCM-2 and MCM-5 were associated significantly with adverse patients' outcome in both univariate (> or =20 vs >20%, P=0.0011 and > or =25 vs <25%, P=0.0100, respectively) and multivariate (P=0.0001 and 0.0090, respectively) analysis. An adequately powered independent group of 45 patients was used in order to validate our results in univariate survival analysis. In this group, MCM-2 and MCM-5 expression retained their prognostic significance (P<0.0001 in both relationships). In conclusion, MCM-2 and MCM-5 proteins appear to be promising as prognostic markers in patients with ovarian adenocarcinomas.
微小染色体维持蛋白(MCM)最近已成为新型增殖标志物,对多种肿瘤类型具有预后意义。这是第一项研究MCM-2和MCM-5在一系列卵巢腺癌和低恶性潜能(LMP)肿瘤中的免疫组化表达的研究,旨在确定其与临床病理参数、传统增殖指数Ki-67、细胞周期调节因子(p53、p27(Kip1)、p21(WAF1)和pRb)以及患者预后之间的可能关联。对43例卵巢LMP肿瘤和85例腺癌进行了免疫组化分析。生存分析仅限于腺癌。与LMP肿瘤相比,腺癌中MCM-2和MCM-5的中位标记指数(LI)显著更高(两者关联的P均<0.0001)。在腺癌中,MCM-2和MCM-5的水平随肿瘤分期进展而显著升高(分别为P=0.0052和P=0.0180),而MCM-2和MCM-5均随肿瘤分级增加(分别为P=0.0002和P=0.0006)以及存在大块残留病灶(两者关系的P<0.0001)而显著升高。MCM-2或MCM-5表达水平与Ki-67 LI(P<0.0001)以及p53蛋白(分别为P=0.0038和P=0.0500)之间建立了强正相关。此外,MCM-2 LI与p27(Kip-1)LI呈负相关(P=0.0068)。最后,在单因素分析(分别为≥20%对>20%,P=0.0011;≥25%对<25%,P=0.0100)和多因素分析(分别为P=0.0001和0.0090)中,MCM-2和MCM-5均与患者不良预后显著相关。为了在单因素生存分析中验证我们的结果,使用了一个有足够样本量的45例患者的独立组。在该组中,MCM-2和MCM-5表达保留了其预后意义(两者关系的P均<0.0001)。总之,MCM-2和MCM-5蛋白似乎有望成为卵巢腺癌患者的预后标志物。