开发一个沟通参与量表:一项认知访谈研究。
Developing a scale of communicative participation: a cognitive interviewing study.
作者信息
Yorkston Kathryn M, Baylor Carolyn R, Dietz Jean, Dudgeon Brian J, Eadie Tanya, Miller Robert M, Amtmann Dagmar
机构信息
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-6490, USA.
出版信息
Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(6):425-33. doi: 10.1080/09638280701625328.
PURPOSE
To revise and improve the instructions, candidate items and response format for a tool to measure communicative participation.
METHOD
Cognitive interviewing techniques, designed to study the process that respondents use to answer survey questions, were used to test a bank of candidate items for a measure of communicative participation. Twelve participants with spasmodic dysphonia (SD), a neurologic condition characterized by voice and speech changes, were asked to complete a sample questionnaire and then were interviewed regarding the clarity of instructions, candidate items and response format. Analysis of the interviews was conducted using qualitative techniques and resulted in a series of modifications to the measurement tool.
RESULTS
Problems identified related to candidate items included inadequate context, double-barreled or ambiguous items, redundancy, unclear or generally confusing items, infrequent situations, and cultural sensitivity. Participants preferred response options that asked them to rate interference rather than other dimensions such as satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS; Subtle differences in items and response options make key differences in how participants interpret and make decisions about their responses. Rich contextual information is needed in order to respond to items that sample communicative participation. Participants preferred response options that capture the barriers that they experience when participating in everyday communication situations.
目的
修订并完善用于衡量沟通参与度的工具的使用说明、候选条目及回答格式。
方法
采用旨在研究受访者回答调查问题过程的认知访谈技术,对一组用于衡量沟通参与度的候选条目进行测试。选取了12名患有痉挛性发声障碍(SD)的参与者,这是一种以声音和言语变化为特征的神经系统疾病,要求他们完成一份示例问卷,然后就使用说明、候选条目和回答格式的清晰度接受访谈。运用定性技术对访谈进行分析,结果对测量工具进行了一系列修改。
结果
在候选条目中发现的问题包括背景信息不足、双管问题或表述模糊的问题、冗余、不清晰或容易造成混淆的问题、罕见情况以及文化敏感性问题。参与者更喜欢那些让他们对干扰程度进行评分的回答选项,而非其他维度,如满意度。结论:条目中的细微差异以及回答选项在参与者如何解释问题以及对回答做出决策方面产生了关键影响。需要丰富的背景信息才能回答那些抽样调查沟通参与度的条目。参与者更喜欢那些能够体现他们在参与日常沟通情境时所遇到障碍的回答选项。