• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体哮喘控制措施的反应率各不相同,可能高估哮喘控制情况:目标研究分析

Rate of response of individual asthma control measures varies and may overestimate asthma control: an analysis of the goal study.

作者信息

Bateman Eric D, Clark Tim J H, Frith Lucy, Bousquet Jean, Busse William W, Pedersen Soren E

机构信息

University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2007 Oct;44(8):667-73. doi: 10.1080/02770900701554821.

DOI:10.1080/02770900701554821
PMID:17943579
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using a composite measure based on clinical outcomes, the GOAL study showed that achievement of Total Control of asthma was time dependent with the proportion of controlled patients continuing to rise through the year-long study. Taking data from this study, we compared time taken to achieve Total Control with time taken to achieve total control of each individual clinical criterion on treatment with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) or fluticasone propionate (FP) alone.

METHODS

Time to achieving total control of individual outcomes (day-time symptoms, night-time awakenings, rescue medication use, PEF > or =80% predicted every day) were analyzed by Kaplan Meier plots and compared with achievement of composite Total Control.

RESULTS

Night-time awakenings responded most rapidly and daytime symptoms took longest to respond. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients who achieved control of any individual clinical criterion was higher than the proportion who achieved control when using the composite outcome (no night-time awakenings achieved by 73% with SFC and 65% with FP; PEF > or =80% predicted every day, 55% and 45% respectively; no rescue usage 46% and 35% respectively; and no daytime symptoms, 35% and 24% respectively, compared with Total Control, 23% and 14% respectively). In every measure except night-time awakenings, more rapid responses were seen for SFC compared with FP alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Speed of response of individual asthma measures varies and evaluation of control using any single measure overestimates total asthma control. Treatment should be continued until composite control is reached, rather than control of individual outcomes.

摘要

背景

GOAL研究使用基于临床结局的综合指标显示,哮喘完全控制的实现具有时间依赖性,在为期一年的研究中,病情得到控制的患者比例持续上升。利用该研究的数据,我们比较了使用沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(SFC)或单用丙酸氟替卡松(FP)治疗时,实现完全控制所需的时间与实现各项临床标准完全控制所需的时间。

方法

通过Kaplan Meier曲线分析实现各项结局(日间症状、夜间觉醒、急救药物使用、每日呼气峰流速(PEF)≥预计值的80%)完全控制的时间,并与综合完全控制的实现情况进行比较。

结果

夜间觉醒的反应最快,日间症状的反应最慢。12周后,实现任何一项临床标准控制的患者比例高于使用综合结局(完全控制)时的比例(SFC组73%、FP组65%无夜间觉醒;每日PEF≥预计值的80%,分别为55%和45%;无急救药物使用,分别为46%和35%;无日间症状,分别为35%和24%,而完全控制分别为23%和14%)。除夜间觉醒外,在各项指标中,SFC组的反应均比单用FP组更快。

结论

各项哮喘指标的反应速度不同,使用任何单一指标评估控制情况都会高估哮喘的整体控制情况。治疗应持续至达到综合控制,而非个别指标的控制。

相似文献

1
Rate of response of individual asthma control measures varies and may overestimate asthma control: an analysis of the goal study.个体哮喘控制措施的反应率各不相同,可能高估哮喘控制情况:目标研究分析
J Asthma. 2007 Oct;44(8):667-73. doi: 10.1080/02770900701554821.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in childhood asthma: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与孟鲁司特治疗儿童哮喘的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.07.018.
3
Components of asthma control and treatment response of individual control criteria in children: analysis of the PEACE study.儿童哮喘控制和治疗反应的个体控制标准成分:PEACE 研究分析。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1182-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21499. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
4
Control of mild to moderate asthma over 1-year with the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate.沙美特罗与丙酸氟替卡松联合使用对轻至中度哮喘的一年期控制。
Respir Med. 2006 Jan;100(1):2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.09.006. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
5
Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy in moderate asthma: a comparison with fluticasone propionate.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合疗法用于中度哮喘维持治疗的起始:与丙酸氟替卡松的比较
J Asthma. 2007 Jul-Aug;44(6):437-41. doi: 10.1080/02770900701421930.
6
[Influence of changing inhalation device from separate diskus of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate to combination diskus in asthma patients].[从沙美特罗与丙酸氟替卡松单剂吸入装置转换为联合吸入装置对哮喘患者的影响]
Arerugi. 2008 Nov;57(11):1134-44.
7
Does measuring BHR add to guideline derived clinical measures in determining treatment for patients with persistent asthma?测量支气管高反应性是否有助于在确定持续性哮喘患者的治疗方案时补充基于指南得出的临床指标?
Respir Med. 2008 May;102(5):665-73. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.12.023. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
8
Comparison of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (FP) combination with FP+sustained release theophylline in moderate asthma patients.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松(FP)联合用药与FP+缓释茶碱治疗中度哮喘患者的比较。
Respir Med. 2008 Jul;102(7):1055-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
9
Determinants of response to fluticasone propionate and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination in the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL study.在“获得最佳哮喘控制”研究中,丙酸氟替卡松及沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合用药反应的决定因素
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
10
Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 mcg Diskus administered once daily.每日一次使用丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗250/50微克准纳器的疗效和安全性。
Respir Med. 2008 Apr;102(4):495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.12.002. Epub 2008 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Expert opinion on gray areas in asthma management: A lesson from the innovative project "revolution in asthma" of the Italian thoracic society (AIPO-ITS).哮喘管理中灰色地带的专家意见:来自意大利胸科学会(AIPO-ITS)“哮喘革命”创新项目的经验教训。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2025 Feb;15(2):e70037. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70037.
2
SABAs as Reliever Medications in Asthma Management: Evidence-Based Science.SABA 作为哮喘管理中的缓解药物:基于证据的科学。
Adv Ther. 2023 Jul;40(7):2927-2943. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02543-9. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
3
The Danish National Database for Asthma: establishing clinical quality indicators.
丹麦国家哮喘数据库:建立临床质量指标
Eur Clin Respir J. 2016 Nov 8;3:33903. doi: 10.3402/ecrj.v3.33903. eCollection 2016.
4
Guidelines for diagnosis and management of bronchial asthma: Joint ICS/NCCP (I) recommendations.支气管哮喘诊断与管理指南:ICS/NCCP联合(I)建议
Lung India. 2015 Apr;32(Suppl 1):S3-S42. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.154517.
5
Drug development for severe asthma: what are the metrics?重度哮喘药物研发:有哪些衡量指标?
Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;135(2):176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 May 22.
6
Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal.哮喘的单一维持和缓解治疗(SMART):批判性评价。
Thorax. 2010 Aug;65(8):747-52. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.128504. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
7
Measures of asthma control and quality of life: longitudinal data provide practical insights into their relative usefulness in different research contexts.哮喘控制和生活质量的测量:纵向数据为其在不同研究背景下的相对效用提供了实际见解。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Apr;18(3):301-12. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9448-4. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
8
Inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists in adult asthma: a winning combination in all?成人哮喘中吸入性糖皮质激素与长效β受体激动剂:对所有人而言都是完美组合吗?
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2008 Aug;378(2):203-15. doi: 10.1007/s00210-008-0302-y. Epub 2008 May 24.