• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童哮喘控制和治疗反应的个体控制标准成分:PEACE 研究分析。

Components of asthma control and treatment response of individual control criteria in children: analysis of the PEACE study.

机构信息

Kolding Hospital, Kolding, Denmark.

出版信息

Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1182-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21499. Epub 2011 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1002/ppul.21499
PMID:21751432
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of asthma management is to achieve and maintain clinical control. Control data for children is sparse.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis evaluated factors associated with not achieving well-controlled (WC) asthma using data from a study in 548 children with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of factors affecting the probability of not achieving WC asthma in children receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 µg bd (SFC) or montelukast 5 mg od (MON), included: reasons for patients failing the asthma control criteria; achievement of overall asthma control; time course of improvement in individual outcomes and composite score; factors associated with not achieving WC asthma.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients failing individual control criteria at baseline was: β2-agonist rescue use: 96%, peak expiratory flow (PEF): 91%, symptoms: 78%, and night-time awakenings: 66%. Most patients failed the composite control score for more than one reason with 482 (99%), 387 (80%), and 249 (52%) failing 2, 3, or 4 control criteria, respectively. Overall asthma control was achieved by 166 (59%) patients in the SFC group and 96 (36%) in the MON group (P < 0.001). Time course of control differed between individual control components with symptoms responding most rapidly and PEF most slowly. Factors significantly influencing the probability of not achieving WC asthma were treatment with MON, country, and night-time awakenings at baseline, treatment being the most important.

CONCLUSION

Different outcomes improve at different rates. Assessment of one or a few outcomes over-estimates the level of asthma control. An overall composite score in combination with the proportion of patients failing on three or more criteria seemed to most accurately reflect the level of control. Compared with SFC treatment, MON was three times less likely to result in good asthma control.

摘要

背景

哮喘管理的目标是实现并维持临床控制。儿童的控制数据较为缺乏。

目的

本分析使用一项纳入 548 例未控制哮喘患儿的研究数据,评估导致患儿无法达到良好控制(WC)哮喘的相关因素。

方法

对影响沙美特罗/氟替卡松丙酸酯 50/100μg 每日 2 次(SFC)或孟鲁司特 5mg 每日 1 次(MON)治疗患儿无法达到 WC 哮喘的相关因素进行事后分析,包括:患儿无法达到哮喘控制标准的原因;整体哮喘控制的实现;各个结局和综合评分改善的时间过程;无法达到 WC 哮喘的相关因素。

结果

基线时存在以下单项控制标准失败的患者比例:β2 激动剂救急使用:96%,呼气峰流速(PEF):91%,症状:78%,夜间觉醒:66%。大多数患者因多个原因无法达到综合控制评分,其中 482 例(99%)、387 例(80%)和 249 例(52%)分别存在 2、3 或 4 项控制标准失败。SFC 组中 166 例(59%)和 MON 组中 96 例(36%)患者实现了整体哮喘控制(P<0.001)。不同的控制指标达到控制的时间过程存在差异,其中症状改善最快,PEF 最慢。显著影响无法达到 WC 哮喘概率的因素包括使用 MON 治疗、国家和基线时的夜间觉醒,其中治疗是最重要的因素。

结论

不同的结局改善速度不同。仅评估一个或几个结局会高估哮喘控制水平。整体综合评分结合存在 3 项或更多标准失败的患者比例,似乎能更准确地反映控制水平。与 SFC 治疗相比,MON 治疗达到良好哮喘控制的可能性低 3 倍。

相似文献

1
Components of asthma control and treatment response of individual control criteria in children: analysis of the PEACE study.儿童哮喘控制和治疗反应的个体控制标准成分:PEACE 研究分析。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Dec;46(12):1182-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21499. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate versus montelukast in childhood asthma: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与孟鲁司特治疗儿童哮喘的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、双模拟、平行组研究。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.07.018.
3
Rate of response of individual asthma control measures varies and may overestimate asthma control: an analysis of the goal study.个体哮喘控制措施的反应率各不相同,可能高估哮喘控制情况:目标研究分析
J Asthma. 2007 Oct;44(8):667-73. doi: 10.1080/02770900701554821.
4
Initiation of maintenance therapy with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination therapy in moderate asthma: a comparison with fluticasone propionate.沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合疗法用于中度哮喘维持治疗的起始:与丙酸氟替卡松的比较
J Asthma. 2007 Jul-Aug;44(6):437-41. doi: 10.1080/02770900701421930.
5
Inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone: a study comparing monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma.吸入沙美特罗和氟替卡松:一项比较哮喘单一疗法与联合疗法的研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Mar;82(3):257-65. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62606-3.
6
Add-on salmeterol compared to double dose fluticasone in pediatric asthma: a double-blind, randomized trial (VIAPAED).附加沙美特罗与双剂量氟替卡松治疗儿童哮喘的比较:一项双盲、随机试验(VIAPAED)。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Nov;44(11):1132-42. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21120.
7
Determinants of response to fluticasone propionate and salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination in the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL study.在“获得最佳哮喘控制”研究中,丙酸氟替卡松及沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松联合用药反应的决定因素
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Nov;120(5):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.07.016. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
8
EXCEL: A randomised trial comparing salmeterol/fluticasone propionate and formoterol/budesonide combinations in adults with persistent asthma.EXCEL:一项比较沙美特罗/丙酸氟替卡松与福莫特罗/布地奈德联合用药治疗成人持续性哮喘的随机试验。
Respir Med. 2006 Jul;100(7):1152-62. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.001. Epub 2006 May 3.
9
Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination compared with montelukast for the treatment of persistent asthma.丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合用药与孟鲁司特治疗持续性哮喘的比较
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Feb;88(2):227-35. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62001-7.
10
Fluticasone propionate and salmeterol administered via Diskus compared with salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone in patients suboptimally controlled with short-acting beta2-agonists.在使用短效β2受体激动剂控制效果欠佳的患者中,与单独使用沙美特罗或丙酸氟替卡松相比,通过都保装置使用丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004 Oct;93(4):351-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61394-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Addition to inhaled corticosteroids of long-acting beta2-agonists versus anti-leukotrienes for chronic asthma.长效β2受体激动剂与抗白三烯药物加用吸入性糖皮质激素治疗慢性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 24;2014(1):CD003137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003137.pub5.