Ambrosio Fabrisia, Boninger Michael L, Fitzgerald Shirley G, Hubbard Sandra L, Schwid Steven R, Cooper Rory A
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Technology, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(5):693-701. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.02.0016.
Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) report decreased satisfaction with their mobility devices compared with individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCIs). This study (1) investigated the demographic differences between veterans with MS (V-MS) and veterans with SCI (V-SCI) who were issued a wheelchair by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and (2) described differences in mobility device prescription. We merged two VHA databases to obtain demographic and wheelchair information for all V-MS and V-SCI in 2000 and 2001. Descriptive information for issued wheelchairs was available for 2,154 V-MS and V-SCI. We found that V-MS were significantly less likely to receive higher quality wheelchairs (manual or power) compared with V-SCI (p < 0.001). The disparity in VHA wheelchair prescription between these two groups indicates a need for further research regarding the assistive device prescription process in these populations.
与脊髓损伤(SCI)患者相比,多发性硬化症(MS)患者对其移动设备的满意度较低。本研究(1)调查了由退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)发放轮椅的MS退伍军人(V-MS)和SCI退伍军人(V-SCI)之间的人口统计学差异,以及(2)描述了移动设备处方的差异。我们合并了两个VHA数据库,以获取2000年和2001年所有V-MS和V-SCI的人口统计学和轮椅信息。有2154名V-MS和V-SCI患者的已发放轮椅的描述性信息。我们发现,与V-SCI相比,V-MS获得更高质量轮椅(手动或电动)的可能性显著降低(p < 0.001)。这两组之间VHA轮椅处方的差异表明,需要对这些人群的辅助设备处方过程进行进一步研究。