• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者之声:对退伍军人及其他辅助技术使用者的调查

The Voice of the Consumer: A Survey of Veterans and Other Users of Assistive Technology.

作者信息

Dicianno Brad E, Joseph James, Eckstein Stacy, Zigler Christina K, Quinby Eleanor, Schmeler Mark R, Schein Richard M, Pearlman Jon, Cooper Rory A

机构信息

Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e518-e525. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy033.

DOI:10.1093/milmed/usy033
PMID:29635318
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6262210/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A total of 3.6 million Americans and over 250,000 veterans use wheelchairs. The need for advancements in mobility-assistive technologies is continually growing due to advances in medicine and rehabilitation that preserve and prolong the lives of people with disabilities, increases in the senior population, and increases in the number of veterans and civilians involved in conflict situations. The purpose of this study is to survey a large sample of veterans and other consumers with disabilities who use mobility-assistive technologies to identify priorities for future research and development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This survey asked participants to provide opinions on the importance of developing various mobility-assistive technologies and to rank the importance of certain technologies. Participants were also asked to provide open-ended comments and suggestions.

RESULTS

A total of 1,022 individuals, including 500 veterans, from 49 states within the USA and Puerto Rico completed the survey. The average age of respondents was 54.3 yr, and they represented both new and experienced users of mobility-assistive technologies. The largest diagnostic group was spinal cord injury (SCI) (N = 491, 48.0%). Several themes on critical areas of research emerged from the open-ended questions, which generated a total of 1,199 comments.

CONCLUSION

This survey revealed several themes for future research and development. Advanced wheelchair design, smart device applications, human-machine interfaces, and assistive robotics and intelligent systems emerged as priorities. Survey results also demonstrated the importance for researchers to understand the effects of policy and cost on translational research and to be involved in educating both consumers and providers.

摘要

引言

共有360万美国人和超过25万退伍军人使用轮椅。由于医学和康复领域的进步延长了残疾人的寿命、老年人口增加以及参与冲突的退伍军人和平民数量增多,对移动辅助技术进步的需求持续增长。本研究的目的是对大量使用移动辅助技术的退伍军人和其他残疾消费者进行调查,以确定未来研发的重点。

材料与方法

本次调查要求参与者对开发各种移动辅助技术的重要性发表意见,并对某些技术的重要性进行排序。参与者还被要求提供开放式的意见和建议。

结果

来自美国49个州和波多黎各的1022人完成了调查,其中包括500名退伍军人。受访者的平均年龄为54.3岁,他们代表了移动辅助技术的新用户和有经验的用户。最大的诊断群体是脊髓损伤(SCI)(N = 491,48.0%)。开放式问题产生了总共1199条意见,从中出现了几个关于关键研究领域的主题。

结论

本次调查揭示了几个未来研发的主题。先进的轮椅设计、智能设备应用、人机界面以及辅助机器人和智能系统成为优先事项。调查结果还表明,研究人员了解政策和成本对转化研究的影响并参与对消费者和提供者的教育非常重要。

相似文献

1
The Voice of the Consumer: A Survey of Veterans and Other Users of Assistive Technology.消费者之声:对退伍军人及其他辅助技术使用者的调查
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e518-e525. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy033.
2
The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers.移动辅助技术供应流程的未来:对供应商的一项调查
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 May;14(4):338-345. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1448470. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.地理空间辅助技术:从手动轮椅使用者那里确定的潜在可用性标准。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Nov;15(8):844-855. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1620351. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
4
Patient perceptions of environmental control units: experiences of Veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders receiving inpatient VA healthcare.患者对环境控制单元的认知:脊髓损伤和疾病退伍军人在退伍军人事务部(VA)接受住院医疗护理的体验
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 May;13(4):325-332. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2017.1312574. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
5
Comparison of mobility device delivery within Department of Veterans Affairs for individuals with multiple sclerosis versus spinal cord injury.美国退伍军人事务部内针对多发性硬化症患者与脊髓损伤患者的移动设备交付情况比较。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(5):693-701. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.02.0016.
6
Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review.利益相关者对移动辅助技术研发优先事项的看法:一项文献综述
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 May;16(4):362-376. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1650300. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Effect of the Assistive Technology Professional on the Provision of Mobility Assistive Equipment.辅助技术专业人员对移动辅助设备提供的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Oct;102(10):1895-1901. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Discovering Provider Awareness of Mobility Assistive Technologies and Clinical Guidelines-A Comparative Analysis With Consumer Responses.发现医疗服务提供者对移动辅助技术和临床指南的认知-与消费者反应的比较分析。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 1;103(10):911-917. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002484. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Assessing consumer profiles of 'ideal' assistive technologies in ten categories: an integration of quantitative and qualitative methods.评估十个类别的“理想”辅助技术的消费者概况:定量与定性方法的整合
Disabil Rehabil. 1997 Dec;19(12):528-35. doi: 10.3109/09638289709166046.
10
Accessibility information in New Delhi for "EaseAccess" Android-based app for persons with disability: an observational study.针对残疾人士的基于安卓系统的“轻松访问”应用程序在新德里的可访问性信息:一项观察性研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Oct;14(7):645-662. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1471743. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Customization of manual wheelchair components: a state-of-the-art review.手动轮椅部件的定制:最新综述
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Mar 24;22(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01547-6.
2
Pilot Testing and Validation of an Educational Game on Transportation Challenges for Mobility Device Users.针对移动设备用户交通挑战的教育游戏的试点测试与验证
Disabilities (Basel). 2024 Dec;4(4):830-842. doi: 10.3390/disabilities4040051. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
3
Consumer views of functional electrical stimulation and robotic exoskeleton in SCI rehabilitation: A mini review.消费者对脊髓损伤康复中功能性电刺激和机器人外骨骼的看法:一项小型综述。
Artif Organs. 2025 May;49(5):729-748. doi: 10.1111/aor.14925. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
4
Time Efficiency and Ergonomic Assessment of a Robotic Wheelchair Transfer System.机器人轮椅转移系统的时间效率与人体工程学评估
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 27;24(23):7558. doi: 10.3390/s24237558.
5
Discovering Provider Awareness of Mobility Assistive Technologies and Clinical Guidelines-A Comparative Analysis With Consumer Responses.发现医疗服务提供者对移动辅助技术和临床指南的认知-与消费者反应的比较分析。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Oct 1;103(10):911-917. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002484. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
6
Evaluation of Electric and Air-Powered Shopping Scooters in Grocery Stores.评估电动和气动购物车在杂货店中的使用。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Sep 1;103(9):819-826. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002457. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
7
Participatory Action Design and Engineering of Powered Personal Transfer System for Wheelchair Users: Initial Design and Assessment.参与式行动设计与动力个人转移系统的工程设计:初始设计与评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;23(12):5540. doi: 10.3390/s23125540.
8
Evaluation of Power Wheelchair Dynamic Suspensions for Tip Prevention in Non-ADA Compliant Surfaces.非 ADA 兼容表面中预防倾翻的动力轮椅动态悬架的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Dec;104(12):2043-2050. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.05.016. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
9
Clinical and Ergonomic Comparison Between a Robotic Assisted Transfer Device and a Mobile Floor Lift During Caregiver-Assisted Wheelchair Transfers.在护理人员辅助轮椅转移过程中,一种机器人辅助转移设备与移动地板升降机的临床和人体工程学比较。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jun 1;101(6):561-568. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001867. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
10
Mini-review: Robotic wheelchair taxonomy and readiness.小型综述:机器人轮椅的分类和准备情况。
Neurosci Lett. 2022 Feb 16;772:136482. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136482. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers.移动辅助技术供应流程的未来:对供应商的一项调查
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 May;14(4):338-345. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1448470. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
Consumer Feedback to Steer the Future of Assistive Technology Research and Development: A Pilot Study.消费者反馈引领辅助技术研发的未来:一项试点研究。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017 Spring;23(2):89-97. doi: 10.1310/sci2302-89.
3
Development of a wheelchair maintenance training programme and questionnaire for clinicians and wheelchair users.为临床医生和轮椅使用者制定轮椅维护培训计划及调查问卷。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Nov;12(8):843-851. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1277792. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
4
Type and Frequency of Reported Wheelchair Repairs and Related Adverse Consequences Among People With Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者报告的轮椅维修类型及频率与相关不良后果
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1753-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.032. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Top ten research priorities for spinal cord injury: the methodology and results of a British priority setting partnership.脊髓损伤的十大研究重点:英国优先事项设定伙伴关系的方法与结果
Spinal Cord. 2016 May;54(5):341-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.199. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
6
Guest editorial: Opportunities in rehabilitation research.特邀社论:康复研究中的机遇
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50(6):vii-xxxii. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.09.0167.
7
Increases in wheelchair breakdowns, repairs, and adverse consequences for people with traumatic spinal cord injury.轮椅故障增加、维修以及创伤性脊髓损伤患者的不良后果。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;91(6):463-9. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825ab5ec.
8
Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility.移动辅助技术的最新趋势。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Apr 20;9:20. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-20.
9
Wheelchair research progress, perspectives, and transformation.轮椅研究进展、展望与变革。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(1):1-5. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.10.0199.
10
The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.脊髓损伤患者的健康和生活重点:系统评价。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 May 20;29(8):1548-55. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2226. Epub 2012 Apr 18.