Hickling F W, Abel W, Garner P, Rathbone J
University of the West Indies, Department of Community Health and Psychiatry, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica, 7.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD003290. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003290.pub2.
As international healthcare policy has moved away from treating people with severe mental illness in large inpatient psychiatric institutions, beds for people with acute psychiatric disorders are being established in specialised psychiatric units in general hospitals. In developing countries, however, limited resources mean that it is not always possible to provide discrete psychiatric units, either in general hospitals or in the community. An alternative model of admission, used in the Caribbean, is to treat the person with acute psychosis in a general hospital ward.
To compare the outcomes for people with acute psychosis who have been admitted to open medical wards with those admitted to conventional psychiatric units.
We searched The Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's study-based register (April 2007). This register is compiled from searches of BIOSIS, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, Sociofile, and many conference proceedings.
We would have included all relevant randomised or quasi-randomised trials, allocating anyone thought to be suffering from an acute psychotic episode to either acute management on general medical wards, or acute management in a specialist psychiatric unit. The primary outcomes of interest were length of stay in hospital and relapse.
We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we would have calculated relative risks (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis based using a fixed effects model.
We didnt identify any relevant randomised trials.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The Caribbean practice of treating people with severe mental illness on general medical wards has been influenced by socio-economic factors rather than evidence from randomised trials. This practice affords an opportunity for a well designed, well conducted and reported randomised trial, now impossible in many other settings.
随着国际医疗政策不再倾向于在大型住院精神科机构中治疗重症精神疾病患者,综合医院的专科精神科单元开始设立急性精神障碍患者床位。然而,在发展中国家,资源有限意味着无论是在综合医院还是社区,都不一定能提供独立的精神科单元。加勒比地区采用的另一种收治模式是在综合医院病房治疗急性精神病患者。
比较入住开放内科病房的急性精神病患者与入住传统精神科单元的患者的治疗效果。
我们检索了Cochrane精神分裂症研究组基于研究的注册库(2007年4月)。该注册库是通过检索BIOSIS、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、LILACS、MEDLINE、PsycINFO、PSYNDEX、Sociofile以及许多会议论文集编制而成。
我们本应纳入所有相关的随机或半随机试验,将任何被认为患有急性精神病发作的患者分配到综合内科病房进行急性治疗,或在专科精神科单元进行急性治疗。主要关注的结局是住院时间和复发情况。
我们独立提取数据。对于二分数据,我们本应基于意向性分析,使用固定效应模型计算相对风险(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。
我们未识别出任何相关的随机试验。
加勒比地区在综合内科病房治疗重症精神疾病患者的做法受到社会经济因素的影响,而非随机试验证据的影响。这种做法为开展一项设计良好、实施得当且报告完善的随机试验提供了机会,而这在许多其他环境中目前已无法实现。