Hunt Michael A, Birmingham Trevor B, Jenkyn Thomas R, Giffin J Robert, Jones Ian C
Wolf Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):635-40. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
Currently, lower limb alignment is measured statically from radiographs that may not accurately represent the condition of the limb when moving and weight-bearing. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to introduce and examine a novel measure of dynamic lower limb alignment obtained during walking in patients with knee OA. In this cross-sectional study, standing, full-length lower limb radiographs were acquired from 80 individuals with confirmed knee OA, who also underwent three-dimensional gait analyses with reflective markers placed on the segments of the lower limb. Frontal plane lower limb alignment was measured using the static radiographs (mechanical axis) and gait analyses (marker-based alignment) by identifying the centres of the hip, knee, and ankle from both methods. Simple linear regression indicated these measures were highly correlated (r=0.84), however, 30% of the variance in the marker-based measure of lower limb alignment was not explained by the mechanical axis despite using the same anatomical landmarks. Results from this study suggest that a valid measure of dynamic lower limb alignment can be obtained from a standard quantitative gait analysis and highlight the differences in measures of lower limb alignment obtained in static and dynamic situations. Future research into the clinical utility of measures of dynamic alignment in the treatment of OA may aid in the development of interventions specifically tailored to one's dynamic lower limb biomechanics during gait.
目前,下肢对线是通过X线片静态测量的,而X线片可能无法准确反映肢体在移动和负重时的状况。因此,本研究的目的是引入并检验一种在膝关节骨关节炎患者行走过程中获得的动态下肢对线的新测量方法。在这项横断面研究中,从80名确诊为膝关节骨关节炎的个体获取了站立位全下肢X线片,这些个体还使用放置在下肢各节段的反光标记进行了三维步态分析。通过两种方法确定髋、膝和踝关节中心,使用静态X线片(机械轴)和步态分析(基于标记的对线)测量额状面下肢对线。简单线性回归表明这些测量高度相关(r = 0.84),然而,尽管使用相同的解剖标志,但基于标记的下肢对线测量中30%的方差无法用机械轴来解释。本研究结果表明,可以从标准定量步态分析中获得有效的动态下肢对线测量方法,并突出了在静态和动态情况下获得的下肢对线测量的差异。未来对动态对线测量在骨关节炎治疗中的临床应用的研究可能有助于开发专门针对个体步态中动态下肢生物力学的干预措施。