Pauls S, Krüger S, Richter K, Muche R, Marre R, Welte T, Billich C, Gonschior S, Schumann C, Boll D, Aschoff A J, Suttorp N
Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätskliniken Ulm, Ulm.
Rofo. 2007 Nov;179(11):1152-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-963286.
To assess interobserver agreement (IOA) in the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates on chest x-rays for patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
From 7/2002 to 12/2005, 806 adults with CAP were included in the multicenter study "CAPNETZ" (7 hospitals). Inclusion criteria were clinical signs of pneumonia and pulmonary opacification on chest x-rays. Each x-ray was reevaluated by two radiologists from the university hospital in consensus reading against the interpreter at the referring hospital in regard to: presence of infiltrate (yes/no/equivocal), transparency (<or=/>50%), localization, and pattern of infiltrates (alveolar/interstitial). The following parameters were documented: digital or film radiography, hospitalization, fever, findings of auscultation, microbiological findings.
The overall IOA concerning the detection of infiltrates was 77.7% (n=626; CI 0.75-0.81), the infiltrates were not verified in 16.4% (n=132) by the referring radiologist with equivocal findings in 5.9% (n=48). The IOA of the different clinical centers varied between 63.2% (n=38, CI 0.48-0.78) and 92.3% (n=65, CI 0.86-0.99). The IOA for the diagnosis of infiltrates was significantly higher for inpatients with 82.6% (n=546; CI 0.80-0.85) than for outpatients with 55.2 % (n=80; CI 0.47-0.63), p<0.0001. The IOA of infiltrates with a transparency >50% was 95.1% (n=215; CI 0.92-0.98) versus 80.4% (n=403; CI 0.77-0.84) for infiltrates with a transparency >50% (p<0.0001). In patients with positive auscultation, the IOA was higher (p=0,034). Chest x-rays of patients with antibiotic therapy or an alveolar infiltrate showed more equivocal findings compared to patients without these features.
There is considerable interobserver variability in the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiographs. The IOA is higher in more opaque infiltrates, positive auscultation and inpatients.
评估社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者胸部X线片上肺部浸润影诊断的观察者间一致性(IOA)。
2002年7月至2005年12月,806例成年CAP患者纳入多中心研究“CAPNETZ”(7家医院)。纳入标准为肺炎临床症状及胸部X线片上肺部出现混浊影。大学医院的两名放射科医生对每张X线片进行重新评估,与转诊医院的解读医生进行一致性阅片,内容包括:浸润影的存在情况(是/否/不明确)、透明度(≤或>50%)、部位及浸润影类型(肺泡型/间质型)。记录以下参数:数字或胶片摄影、住院情况、发热、听诊结果、微生物学检查结果。
浸润影检测的总体IOA为77.7%(n = 626;CI 0.75 - 0.81),转诊放射科医生未确认浸润影的比例为16.4%(n = 132),不明确结果的比例为5.9%(n = 48)。不同临床中心的IOA在63.2%(n = 38,CI 0.48 - 0.78)至92.3%(n = 65,CI 0.86 - 0.99)之间。住院患者浸润影诊断的IOA显著高于门诊患者,分别为82.6%(n = 546;CI 0.80 - 0.85)和55.2%(n = 80;CI 0.47 - 0.63),p < 0.0001。透明度>50%的浸润影的IOA为95.1%(n = 215;CI 0.92 - 0.98),而透明度≤50%的浸润影的IOA为80.4%(n = 403;CI 0.77 - 0.84)(p < 0.0001)。听诊阳性患者的IOA更高(p = 0.034)。与无这些特征的患者相比,接受抗生素治疗或有肺泡浸润影的患者胸部X线片显示出更多不明确结果。
胸部X线片上肺部浸润影的诊断存在相当大的观察者间变异性。在浸润影更不透明、听诊阳性及住院患者中IOA更高。