Suppr超能文献

保留十二指肠的胰头切除术治疗慢性胰腺炎:机构经验及全国使用情况调查

Duodenum-preserving head resection for chronic pancreatitis: an institutional experience and national survey of usage.

作者信息

Varghese Thomas K, Bell Richard H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2007 Oct;142(4):588-93; discussion 593.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2007.08.009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections (DPPHRs) have been shown in European randomized clinical trials to be superior to pancreaticoduodenectomy for chronic pancreatitis, but DPPHR procedures have been slow to be adopted in the United States.

METHODS

To assess national attitudes of surgeons toward DPPHR, a web-based survey was administered to the U.S. members of the Pancreas Club, which is a national organization of pancreatic surgeons. We also performed a retrospective review of 21 DPPHRs, performed by the senior author, for chronic pancreatitis between January 2000 and March 2005.

RESULTS

The web-based national survey was completed by 64 of 118 members of the Pancreas Club (54.24%). Of the 59 surgeons who perform operations for chronic pancreatitis, 34 had performed a DPPHR at least once. Only 23 U.S. surgeons continue to perform these procedures. Most surgeons who are not performing DPPHRs responded that, despite the published literature, existing procedures such as the Whipple and Puestow were better procedures. In our clinical series, 12 men and 9 women with a mean age of 48.2 +/- 9.6 years underwent DPPHR. The median length of stay was 9 days with 6 patients (28%) who had complications in the postoperative period. Ten of 20 potentially evaluable patients completed a visual analog pain scale and EORTC C-30 quality-of-life questionnaire. Pancreatic functioning approached the normal range in all domains. As compared with a general population of patients with chronic pancreatitis, significant improvement occurred in pancreatic-related pain and digestive function. Self-reported pain was significantly better after operation than before operation.

CONCLUSIONS

DPPHR provides excellent functional results with relatively low postoperative morbidity and duration of stay. These procedures are underused in the United States, with very few surgeons who use, teach them, or report their results.

摘要

背景

欧洲随机临床试验表明,保留十二指肠的胰头切除术(DPPHRs)在治疗慢性胰腺炎方面优于胰十二指肠切除术,但在美国,DPPHR手术的应用进展缓慢。

方法

为评估外科医生对DPPHR的全国性态度,我们对胰腺俱乐部的美国成员进行了一项基于网络的调查,该俱乐部是一个胰腺外科医生的全国性组织。我们还对资深作者在2000年1月至2005年3月期间为慢性胰腺炎实施的21例DPPHR进行了回顾性分析。

结果

胰腺俱乐部118名成员中有64名(54.24%)完成了基于网络的全国性调查。在59名进行慢性胰腺炎手术的外科医生中,34名至少实施过一次DPPHR。只有23名美国外科医生继续开展这些手术。大多数未实施DPPHR的外科医生回应称,尽管有已发表的文献,但像惠普尔手术和普埃斯托手术等现有手术更好。在我们的临床系列中,12名男性和9名女性接受了DPPHR,平均年龄为48.2±9.6岁。中位住院时间为9天,6例患者(28%)术后出现并发症。20例可能可评估的患者中有10例完成了视觉模拟疼痛量表和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织C-30生活质量问卷。所有领域的胰腺功能均接近正常范围。与慢性胰腺炎患者总体相比,胰腺相关疼痛和消化功能有显著改善。自我报告的疼痛术后明显优于术前。

结论

DPPHR能提供良好的功能结果,术后发病率和住院时间相对较低。这些手术在美国未得到充分利用,很少有外科医生使用、教授或报告其结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验