Frecker M F
Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Dec;45(4):307-11. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.4.307.
The aims were (1) to identify from death certificates regions with an increased incidence of dementia mortality; and (2) to determine whether a previously observed excess of patients with Alzheimer disease originating from a small area could be confirmed in a survey of death certificates.
The study identified all individuals dying with dementia, recorded on death certificates as an immediate, antecedent, underlying, or contributing cause of death. Rather than the usual residence, the birthplace of these individuals was used to determine regional differences in dementia mortality. A comparison was made of two areas to test the significance of a geographical isolate of persons. To test for a possible genetic component of the excess, an analysis was made of the frequencies of family names. To test for a possible environmental component an analysis was made of standard measurements of drinking water quality.
The survey data were derived from all 1985 and 1986 deaths in the province of Newfoundland.
Based on the current census population, the prevalence of dementia at death for 1985 and 1986 was 34 and 37/100,000. For both years there was a significant excess of persons originating from a small area (95% CI, 1.1-20.7%, and 2.5-20.4%). This excess could not be explained by differences in age, sex, ethnic origin, or by variation in mobility patterns. The study area has a high concentration of aluminium in the drinking water. An analysis of the family names gave inconclusive evidence of a clustering among the dementia cases.
If all contributing causes of death are recorded and the birthplace of individuals is noted, mortality statistics can reveal regional differences in dementia rates. This shows the need to examine areas smaller than census districts to identify subpopulation variation in the prevalence of dementia. Environmental influences can vary substantially in areas relatively close together, as evidenced in measurements of drinking water chemistry. Genetic influences are more likely to be revealed from the birthplace of individuals, which may indicate a common ancestry.
本研究旨在(1)从死亡证明中确定痴呆症死亡率增加的地区;(2)通过对死亡证明的调查,确定之前观察到的来自小区域的阿尔茨海默病患者过多的情况是否得到证实。
该研究识别了所有死于痴呆症的个体,这些个体在死亡证明上被记录为直接、先前、潜在或促成死亡原因。这些个体的出生地而非通常居住地,被用于确定痴呆症死亡率的地区差异。对两个地区进行了比较,以检验人群地理隔离的显著性。为了检验这种过多情况可能的遗传因素,对姓氏频率进行了分析。为了检验可能的环境因素,对饮用水质量的标准测量值进行了分析。
调查数据来自纽芬兰省1985年和1986年的所有死亡记录。
根据当前人口普查数据,1985年和1986年死亡时痴呆症的患病率分别为34/10万和37/10万。在这两年中,来自一个小区域的人数均显著过多(95%置信区间,1.1 - 20.7%和2.5 - 20.4%)。这种过多情况无法用年龄、性别、种族差异或流动模式的变化来解释。研究区域的饮用水中铝含量很高。对姓氏的分析给出了痴呆症病例中存在聚集的不确定证据。
如果记录所有促成死亡的原因并注明个体的出生地,死亡率统计数据可以揭示痴呆症发病率的地区差异。这表明需要研究比普查区更小的区域,以识别痴呆症患病率的亚人群差异。正如饮用水化学测量所证明的,相对靠近的地区环境影响可能有很大差异。遗传影响更有可能从个体的出生地揭示出来,这可能表明有共同的祖先。